Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] uploading from protege

Randy Heiland heiland at indiana.edu
Thu Feb 5 12:42:54 PST 2009


Actually, we had an error when trying to load a 4.0-generated one into  
3.4.

An unrelated question - for doing *collaborative* editing, should one  
use the WebProtege or protege 3.4 (with some plugin?) or ...?

-Randy

On Feb 5, 2009, at 2:07 PM, Natasha Noy wrote:

> Dear Randy,
>
> BioPortal uses Protege 3.4 as its backend for OWL ontologies. However,
> most Protege 4 ontologies should load just fine in Protege 3. Do you
> know if your ontology loads in Protege 3.4 or does it use some
> constructs that are specific to OWL 2?
>
> Natasha
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Randy Heiland wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a mechanism for uploading a simple ontology that we've built
>> in protege 4.0 to BioPortal?
>>
>> thanks, Randy Heiland
>> _______________________________________________
>> bioontology-support mailing list
>> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/bioontology-support
>




More information about the bioontology-support mailing list