Search Mailing List Archives
[bioontology-support] Potential bug on bioportal ontology details view
noy at stanford.edu
Sun Jul 26 13:38:45 PDT 2009
Ah, sorry, I was looking at a different term. So, the problem with
this term is that it does not have any parents defined. Let us
investigate a bit and we'll get back to you.
Chris -- please disregard my message on the visualization problems:
the visualization is correct and the arrows go in the right direction.
Sorry for the confusion!
On Jul 26, 2009, at 1:13 PM, topalis at imbb.forth.gr wrote:
> Actually the visualisation is correct. The terms not appearing are
> all "children" of CHEBI:39116 and this explains the direction of the
> arrow (e.g.
> id: CHEBI:34911
> name: permethrin
> synonym: "(3-Phenoxyphenyl)methyl (+-)-cis,trans-3-(2,2-
> dichloroethenyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate" RELATED
> synonym: "Permethrin" EXACT [KEGG COMPOUND:]
> synonym: "3-phenoxybenzyl 3-(2,2-dichloroethenyl)-2,2-
> dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate" EXACT IUPAC_NAME [IUPAC:]
> synonym: "3-(2,2-Dichloroethenyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane
> carboxylic acid, (3-phenoxyphenyl) methyl ester" RELATED [ChemIDplus:]
> synonym: "C21H20Cl2O3" RELATED FORMULA [KEGG COMPOUND:]
> synonym: "CC1(C)C(C=C(Cl)Cl)C1C(=O)OCc1cccc(Oc2ccccc2)c1" RELATED
> SMILES [ChEBI:]
> synonym: "InChI=1/C21H20Cl2O3/
> h3-12,17,19H,13H2,1-2H3" RELATED InChI [ChEBI:]
> synonym: "InChIKey=RLLPVAHGXHCWKJ-UHFFFAOYAS" RELATED InChIKey
> xref: KEGG COMPOUND:C14388 "KEGG COMPOUND"
> xref: KEGG COMPOUND:52645-53-1 "CAS Registry Number"
> xref: ChemIDplus:52645-53-1 "CAS Registry Number"
> relationship: has_role CHEBI:39116
> relationship: has_role CHEBI:39259
> relationship: has_functional_parent CHEBI:39308
> relationship: has_role CHEBI:33286
> relationship: has_role CHEBI:38956)
> In fact this term is not appearing at all in the ontology details
> view. And this is the case with other terms not only in ChEBI. I
> recently submitted IDOMAL to bioportal and this exactly what is
> happening with the terms related with has_role relation to others.
> Thanks for your reply
> Quoting Natasha Noy <noy at stanford.edu>:
>> It's a bug in visualization, I think: this concept has only has_role
>> links coming *into* it. The graph shouldn't display them at all
>> these properties start with "[R]"). Below is the definition from the
>> OBO file:
>> id: CHEBI:39116
>> name: pyrethroid ester insecticide
>> synonym: "pyrethroid ester insecticides" RELATED [ChEBI:]
>> is_a: CHEBI:26413
>> And the service returns a bunch of "[R]" relations:
>> On Jul 26, 2009, at 10:28 AM, Pantelis Topalis wrote:
>>> Dear bioportal developers,
>>> I noticed that on ontology details view the only terms they show
>>> up are those that are related to their parents with an is_a or
>>> part_of relation only.
>>> At the same moment the terms which are "hidden" from the ontology
>>> details view are appearing correctly to the visualisation tab.
>>> An example of this behaviour it can be found on ChEBI and term
>>> "pyrethroid ester resistance" (CHEBI:39116) . On the
>>> visualization tab several children related with has_role relation
>>> can be found but none of them is appearing on the ontology
>>> details view.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Pantelis Topalis
>>> VectorBase at IMBB
>>> bioontology-support mailing list
>>> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
> This message was sent using IMBB - WebMail.
More information about the bioontology-support