Search Mailing List Archives
[bioontology-support] Problem with multiple paths to root
whetzel at stanford.edu
Wed Aug 11 20:58:21 PDT 2010
The path to the root is based on is_a relations. The relation between
GO:0051726 and GO:0007049 is the relation 'regulation of cell cycle'
and therefore is not included in the rootpath. On the other hand, the
term melanoma from the NCI Thesaurus does contain 2 is_a parents and
both are included in the output of rootpath call, e.g. http://rest.bioontology.org/bioportal/virtual/rootpath/1032/Melanomafirstname.lastname@example.org
Do you have a need to include relations other than is_a in the
On Aug 11, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Emily Howe wrote:
> Hi Trish,
> How are you doing? I just noticed a problem with GO terms having
> multiple paths to root, here is one example.
> GO:0051726 Here is the path returned from the annotator
> or with go extension
> they are the same.
> However if I look up the go term in AmiGo
> You can see we are missing the path containing
> Am I doing something wrong? Is this a known issue, is there a work
More information about the bioontology-support