Search Mailing List Archives
[bioontology-support] suggestion: bioportal_page annotation property
noy at stanford.edu
Wed Mar 24 18:44:20 PDT 2010
I think this makes a lot of sense. We'll post something like this
shortly. Thanks a lot for the suggestion!
On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> There will be many cases in which people will want to include a link
> to the bioportal visualization of a term. I suggest that Bioportal
> make a small ontology available, initially containing a single
> annotation property: bioportal:page, spiritually a subproperty of
> I would document this appropriately, and indicate that user MAY wish
> to declare foaf:page an annotation property, and make this an
> annotation subproperty of foaf:page, but not do so in the ontology, as
> this may represent a commitment that the user may not wish to make (as
> foaf does not declare foaf:page to be an annotation property, just an
> I would be happy to review other suggestion for inclusion in the
> ontology, which I suggest be kept small and with attention to not
> introducing unnecessary ontological commitments.
> I have attached a suggested start.
> bioontology-support mailing list
> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
More information about the bioontology-support