Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] suggestion: bioportal_page annotation property

Natasha Noy noy at stanford.edu
Thu Mar 25 16:30:49 PDT 2010


oops, sorry -- doing too many things at once. It should be:

   <owl:imports rdf:resource="http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/bioportal/bioportal.owl 
"/>

Natasha


On Mar 25, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:

> Hmm. At that address I get:
>
> <html>
> 	<body>
> 		Gone, Daddy, Gone!
> 	</body>
> </html>
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Natasha Noy <noy at stanford.edu> wrote:
>> ok, done: you can now use
>>   <owl:imports
>> rdf:resource="http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/bioportal.owl"/>
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion!
>>
>> Natasha
>>
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>>
>>> Of course I hand edited the file before sending it, and made a  
>>> mistake :(
>>> Attached is one that works.
>>> -Alan
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Alan Ruttenberg
>>> <alanruttenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There will be many cases in which people will want to include a  
>>>> link
>>>> to the bioportal visualization of a term. I suggest that Bioportal
>>>> make a small ontology available, initially containing a single
>>>> annotation property: bioportal:page, spiritually a subproperty of
>>>> foaf:page.
>>>>
>>>> I would document this appropriately, and indicate that user MAY  
>>>> wish
>>>> to declare foaf:page an annotation property, and make this an
>>>> annotation subproperty of foaf:page, but not do so in the  
>>>> ontology, as
>>>> this may represent a commitment that the user may not wish to  
>>>> make (as
>>>> foaf does not declare foaf:page to be an annotation property,  
>>>> just an
>>>> rdf:property).
>>>>
>>>> I would be happy to review other suggestion for inclusion in the
>>>> ontology, which I suggest be kept small and with attention to not
>>>> introducing unnecessary ontological commitments.
>>>>
>>>> I have attached a suggested start.
>>>>
>>>> -Alan
>>>>
>>> <bioportal.owl>_______________________________________________
>>> bioontology-support mailing list
>>> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/bioontology-support
>>
>>




More information about the bioontology-support mailing list