Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] suggestion: bioportal_page annotation property

Natasha Noy noy at stanford.edu
Thu Mar 25 23:26:04 PDT 2010


On a second thought -- too many "bioportals" in that import. Let's do

  <owl:imports rdf:resource="http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/bioportal.owl 
"/>

instead.

Sorry for the confusion!

Natasha


On Mar 25, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:

> On Thursday, March 25, 2010, Natasha Noy <noy at stanford.edu> wrote:
>> Oh, and not that in the comment there I changed the URL for the  
>> BioPortal page for the concept to use the "virtual" id so  that it  
>> always resolves to the latest version. That's the preferred way, I  
>> think.
>
> Yes, thanks. Didn't realize I could do that.
> -Alan
>>
>> Natasha
>>
>>
>> On Mar 25, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>>
>>
>> looks good now.
>> -A
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Natasha Noy <noy at stanford.edu>  
>> wrote:
>>
>> oops, sorry -- doing too many things at once. It should be:
>>
>>  <owl:imports
>> rdf:resource="http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/bioportal/bioportal.owl 
>> "/>
>>
>> Natasha
>>
>>
>> On Mar 25, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hmm. At that address I get:
>>
>> <html>
>>       <body>
>>               Gone, Daddy, Gone!
>>       </body>
>> </html>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Natasha Noy <noy at stanford.edu>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> ok, done: you can now use
>>  <owl:imports
>> rdf:resource="http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/bioportal.owl"/>
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion!
>>
>> Natasha
>>
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>>
>>
>> Of course I hand edited the file before sending it, and made a  
>> mistake
>> :(
>> Attached is one that works.
>> -Alan
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Alan Ruttenberg
>> <alanruttenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> There will be many cases in which people will want to include a link
>> to the bioportal visualization of a term. I suggest that Bioportal
>> make a small ontology available, initially containing a single
>> annotation property: bioportal:page, spiritually a subproperty of
>> foaf:page.
>>
>> I would document this appropriately, and indicate that user MAY wish
>> to declare foaf:page an annotation property, and make this an
>> annotation subproperty of foaf:page, but not do so in the ontology,  
>> as
>> this may represent a commitment that the user may not wish to make  
>> (as
>> foaf does not declare foaf:page to be an annotation property, just an
>> rdf:property).
>>
>> I would be happy to review other suggestion for inclusion in the
>> ontology, which I suggest be kept small and with attention to not
>> introducing unnecessary ontological commitments.
>>
>> I have attached a suggested start.
>>
>> -Alan
>>
>>
>> <bioportal.owl>_______________________________________________
>> bioontology-support mailing list
>> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/bioontology-support
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>




More information about the bioontology-support mailing list