[bioontology-support] Mismatching of views' base version

[Natasha Noy]

Hi Samson,

Yes, we should really have a way for you to indicate which version of  
the ontology you are attaching your view to. And the current behavior  
is a bug anyway (I added it to the tracker).

I've also fixed the metadata for these views. Things should be good now.

Natasha


On May 9, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Samson Tu wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Friday I updated the Bioportal's ICECI ontology to OWL version  
> 1.02. Then I updated the 11 views of the ontology so that they can  
> be linked to the new version. However, Bioportal linked the views to  
> the earlier version (OWL version 1.01, see screen shot below)
>
> How can I correct the mismatch in the binding of views? When I was  
> updating the views, I didn't see a way to specify the correct base  
> version.  I think it important that an explicit mechanism be there  
> for the correct matching of versions. Not being able to specify  
> explicitly the correct base version when creating views is a  
> problem. Aside from the problem when bioportal's "most recent"  
> version is incorrect, I can certainly imagine situations where we  
> want to create views whose base versions are not necessarily the  
> most recent version of the ontology.
>
>
> <moz-screenshot-20.png>
> -- 
> Samson Tu                                   email: swt at stanford.edu
> Senior Research Scientist                   web: www.stanford.edu/ 
> ~swt/
> Center for Biomedical Informatics Research  phone: 1-650-725-3391
> Stanford University                         fax: 1-650-725-7944
> _______________________________________________
> bioontology-support mailing list
> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/bioontology-support