Search Mailing List Archives
[bioontology-support] Mismatching of views' base version
noy at stanford.edu
Mon May 10 11:19:38 PDT 2010
Yes, we should really have a way for you to indicate which version of
the ontology you are attaching your view to. And the current behavior
is a bug anyway (I added it to the tracker).
I've also fixed the metadata for these views. Things should be good now.
On May 9, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Samson Tu wrote:
> On Friday I updated the Bioportal's ICECI ontology to OWL version
> 1.02. Then I updated the 11 views of the ontology so that they can
> be linked to the new version. However, Bioportal linked the views to
> the earlier version (OWL version 1.01, see screen shot below)
> How can I correct the mismatch in the binding of views? When I was
> updating the views, I didn't see a way to specify the correct base
> version. I think it important that an explicit mechanism be there
> for the correct matching of versions. Not being able to specify
> explicitly the correct base version when creating views is a
> problem. Aside from the problem when bioportal's "most recent"
> version is incorrect, I can certainly imagine situations where we
> want to create views whose base versions are not necessarily the
> most recent version of the ontology.
> Samson Tu email: swt at stanford.edu
> Senior Research Scientist web: www.stanford.edu/
> Center for Biomedical Informatics Research phone: 1-650-725-3391
> Stanford University fax: 1-650-725-7944
> bioontology-support mailing list
> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
More information about the bioontology-support