Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] full id vs short id in ontology terms

Trish Whetzel whetzel at
Tue May 18 09:21:42 PDT 2010

Hi Lena,

As a quick note, we are developing a PROTOTYPE triple store that is  
accessible at: As for the  
other items, a fix has been implemented to provide the full URI via  
the widgets and I am checking to see when this will be available on  
the production site.


On May 18, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Helena Deus wrote:

> Hello,
> When trying to obtain a full URI for certain terms using the  
> ontology widgets, I came acrros many terms that do not have a full  
> ID in the format of a URI. For example, the term "MRSA", in ontology  
> id 40397 (concept id is T4539). I have been trying to discover,  
> using the same json service that bioportal widgets use (ex: 
> , but even there no full ID in the format of a URI exists.
> Alternativelly, I tried to get the full URI using the "concepts"  
> REST service ( 
> ), but this leads me to a list of terms formatted as XML. Ideally,  
> to be SPARQL compatible, I would meed this URI (or the full UID  
> within it) to return data in RDF format, is it possible? Maybe with  
> a small addition of syntax this could be achieved (ex: 
>  ?? I may be missing something but was unable to find in the  
> documentation how to obtain the necessary RDF representation to  
> integrate in SPARQL queries.
> Thanks
> Lena
> _______________________________________________
> bioontology-support mailing list
> bioontology-support at

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the bioontology-support mailing list