Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] full id vs short id in ontology terms

Helena Deus helenadeus at
Tue May 18 09:25:58 PDT 2010

Thanks, Trish

Do you have some example queries to run on the SPARQL endpoint?

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Trish Whetzel <whetzel at> wrote:

> Hi Lena,
> As a quick note, we are developing a *PROTOTYPE* triple store that is
> accessible at: As for the other
> items, a fix has been implemented to provide the full URI via the widgets
> and I am checking to see when this will be available on the production site.
> Trish
> On May 18, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Helena Deus wrote:
> Hello,
> When trying to obtain a full URI for certain terms using the ontology
> widgets, I came acrros many terms that do not have a full ID in the format
> of a URI. For example, the term "MRSA", in ontology id 40397 (concept id
> is T4539). I have been trying to discover, using the same json service that
> bioportal widgets use (ex:
> but even there no full ID in the format of a URI exists.
> Alternativelly, I tried to get the full URI using the "concepts" REST
> service (, but
> this leads me to a list of terms formatted as XML. Ideally, to be SPARQL
> compatible, I would meed this URI (or the full UID within it) to return data
> in RDF format, is it possible? Maybe with a small addition of syntax this
> could be achieved (ex:
> ??
> I may be missing something but was unable to find in the documentation how
> to obtain the necessary RDF representation to integrate in SPARQL queries.
> Thanks
> Lena
> _______________________________________________
> bioontology-support mailing list
> bioontology-support at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the bioontology-support mailing list