Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] Feedback

Vempati, Uma UVempati at
Wed Mar 23 11:48:17 PDT 2011

Hello Trish,
I checked it quickly and it seems to be fine. I will go over it in more detail later today and again confirm.


From: Trish Whetzel [mailto:whetzel at]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 2:42 PM
To: Stephan Schurer PhD
Cc: Vempati, Uma; Saminda Abeyruwan; support at Support
Subject: Re: [bioontology-support] Feedback

The file was re-parsed, can you review the hierarchy?


On Mar 23, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Stephan Schurer PhD wrote:

Hallo Trish,

I just noted that the explore link is active again; however the ontology is still depicted incorrectly as before:

Can you remove the link again if it cannot be properly displayed.


On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Stephan Schurer PhD <stephan.schurer at<mailto:stephan.schurer at>> wrote:
Dear Trish,

This is a good short-term solution. Please let us know if you need
anything from us for this.



On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Trish Whetzel <whetzel at<mailto:whetzel at>> wrote:
> Dear Stephan,
> The short-term plan for display of ontologies that use OWL2 constructs will be to remove the problematic axioms via a utility the Protege group developed. However, the original, unmodified OWL file will be available from the download link. The longer term plan is to implement support for OWL2.
> I believe we will be able to get the BAO file loaded this week.
> Trish

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the bioontology-support mailing list