Search Mailing List Archives
UVempati at med.miami.edu
Wed Mar 23 11:48:17 PDT 2011
I checked it quickly and it seems to be fine. I will go over it in more detail later today and again confirm.
From: Trish Whetzel [mailto:whetzel at stanford.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 2:42 PM
To: Stephan Schurer PhD
Cc: Vempati, Uma; Saminda Abeyruwan; support at bioontology.org Support
Subject: Re: [bioontology-support] Feedback
The file was re-parsed, can you review the hierarchy?
On Mar 23, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Stephan Schurer PhD wrote:
I just noted that the explore link is active again; however the ontology is still depicted incorrectly as before:
Can you remove the link again if it cannot be properly displayed.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Stephan Schurer PhD <stephan.schurer at gmail.com<mailto:stephan.schurer at gmail.com>> wrote:
This is a good short-term solution. Please let us know if you need
anything from us for this.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Trish Whetzel <whetzel at stanford.edu<mailto:whetzel at stanford.edu>> wrote:
> Dear Stephan,
> The short-term plan for display of ontologies that use OWL2 constructs will be to remove the problematic axioms via a utility the Protege group developed. However, the original, unmodified OWL file will be available from the download link. The longer term plan is to implement support for OWL2.
> I believe we will be able to get the BAO file loaded this week.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bioontology-support