[bioontology-support] Fwd: IDO, etc. problem with definitions

[Barry Smith]

I notice that IDO is said to have 184 terms without definitions. I believe
that the reason for this is that Bioportal does not recognize the
'has_definition' label, which is what IDO (and OGMS, and OBI, and BFO ...)
uses to link a term to its definition. Can you include this annotation
property in your  count of classes with definitions?
 BS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/bioontology-support/attachments/20120405/162f0dd0/attachment.html>