Search Mailing List Archives
[bioontology-support] Fwd: IDO, etc. problem with definitions
phismith at buffalo.edu
Thu Apr 5 06:01:43 PDT 2012
I notice that IDO is said to have 184 terms without definitions. I believe
that the reason for this is that Bioportal does not recognize the
'has_definition' label, which is what IDO (and OGMS, and OBI, and BFO ...)
uses to link a term to its definition. Can you include this annotation
property in your count of classes with definitions?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bioontology-support