Search Mailing List Archives
[bioontology-support] Fwd: IDO, etc. problem with definitions
whetzel at stanford.edu
Wed Apr 11 09:09:42 PDT 2012
The property specified for the definitions in IDO is:
I'll run some additional checks to confirm the definition count.
In the meantime, Lindsay is http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115 the property for definitions in IDO?
On Apr 5, 2012, at 2:01 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
> I notice that IDO is said to have 184 terms without definitions. I believe that the reason for this is that Bioportal does not recognize the 'has_definition' label, which is what IDO (and OGMS, and OBI, and BFO ...) uses to link a term to its definition. Can you include this annotation property in your count of classes with definitions?
> bioontology-support mailing list
> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bioontology-support