[bioontology-support] Fwd: IDO, etc. problem with definitions

[Trish Whetzel]

Hi Barry, 

The property specified for the definitions in IDO is:
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115
I'll run some additional checks to confirm the definition count.

In the meantime, Lindsay is http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115 the property for definitions in IDO?

Trish 


On Apr 5, 2012, at 2:01 PM, Barry Smith wrote:

> I notice that IDO is said to have 184 terms without definitions. I believe that the reason for this is that Bioportal does not recognize the 'has_definition' label, which is what IDO (and OGMS, and OBI, and BFO ...) uses to link a term to its definition. Can you include this annotation property in your  count of classes with definitions?
> BS
> _______________________________________________
> bioontology-support mailing list
> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/bioontology-support


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/bioontology-support/attachments/20120411/3641543f/attachment.html>