Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] appliance V1.0

Paul R Alexander palexander at stanford.edu
Mon Aug 20 17:39:56 PDT 2012


Sina,

If anything, the parsing process should be more reliable in the 1.0 
version as we added some code to ensure minor errors did not cause 
parsing failures. There have been no new post-processing steps added 
recently.

The UI will still cache data, so doing an 'ncborestart' might resolve that.

Paul


On 8/17/12 9:06 AM, Madani,Sina wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I installed the new version of appliance in our local environment. The 
> first terminology inject, SNOMED, was successful according to Lexgrid 
> log file. However, when I manually flushed memcashed the status showed 
> that SNOMED is parsing. This status is being shown since last night 
> after Lexgrid load was successfully finished.
>
> Before uploading SNOMED, I changed parser schedule to False and 
> rebuilt build.property file. Also, in submit new ontology form I used 
> a very small zip file for SNOMED (per previous instructions). Then I 
> did FTP to upload the complete SNOMED zip file (400Mb) to the upload 
> folder, unzipped it, and manually (from Admin menu) parsed ontology 
> 10001. In previous versions, after successful parsing I was able to 
> browse and searched immediately.
>
> Are new automatic processing(s) added after parsing in Version 1.0?
>
> Thanks
>
> Sina
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bioontology-support mailing list
> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/bioontology-support

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/bioontology-support/attachments/20120820/7b691a1c/attachment.html>


More information about the bioontology-support mailing list