Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] FMA ontology

Natasha Noy noy at stanford.edu
Thu Mar 15 09:09:44 PDT 2012


Sina,

It's better to load the OWL version, available from the FMA web site [1]. THe property for preferred name is rdf:Label and the synonym property is Synonym.

Natasha

[1] http://code.google.com/p/fma-in-owl/downloads/detail?name=fma.owl

On Mar 14, 2012, at 7:44 AM, Madani,Sina wrote:

> Should I process FMA ontology, in our local appliance instance, as Protege format or OWL? The download file from NCBO (V.3.1) contains a pprj file while on the info page it is mentioned "Format: OWL". If the later is true should I use fma:synonym and fma: definition for the related property slots?
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Sina
> _______________________________________________
> bioontology-support mailing list
> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/bioontology-support



More information about the bioontology-support mailing list