Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Barry Smith

Ray Fergerson ray.fergerson at stanford.edu
Tue Mar 27 13:28:33 PDT 2012


Barry,

There are indeed many terms with definitions but there are many terms
without as well. Just poking around, the upper level nodes in the
anatomical entity branch seem to have definitions while the deeper ones do
not. Other top-level branches have no definitions at all. The metrics
currently report roughly 1150 terms with definitions. It is not obvious to
me that this number is wrong.

Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bioontology-support-bounces at lists.stanford.edu
> [mailto:bioontology-support-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of
> support at bioontology.org
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 9:46 PM
> To: support at bioontology.org; phismith at buffalo.edu
> Subject: [bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Barry Smith
> 
> 
> Name: Barry Smith
> 
> Email: phismith at buffalo.edu
> 
> Location: http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/44507?p=terms
> 
> Comment:
> 
> Your metadata lists the number of classes in the FMA as 83281, and
> lists the number of classes without definitions as 82381
> 
> http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/1053
> 
> But there are many terms with definitions in the FMA.
> _______________________________________________
> bioontology-support mailing list
> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/bioontology-support


More information about the bioontology-support mailing list