Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Barry Smith

Ray Fergerson ray.fergerson at
Tue Mar 27 13:28:33 PDT 2012


There are indeed many terms with definitions but there are many terms
without as well. Just poking around, the upper level nodes in the
anatomical entity branch seem to have definitions while the deeper ones do
not. Other top-level branches have no definitions at all. The metrics
currently report roughly 1150 terms with definitions. It is not obvious to
me that this number is wrong.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: bioontology-support-bounces at
> [mailto:bioontology-support-bounces at] On Behalf Of
> support at
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 9:46 PM
> To: support at; phismith at
> Subject: [bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Barry Smith
> Name: Barry Smith
> Email: phismith at
> Location:
> Comment:
> Your metadata lists the number of classes in the FMA as 83281, and
> lists the number of classes without definitions as 82381
> But there are many terms with definitions in the FMA.
> _______________________________________________
> bioontology-support mailing list
> bioontology-support at

More information about the bioontology-support mailing list