Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Benjamin Leinfelder

Ray Fergerson ray.fergerson at stanford.edu
Wed Dec 10 15:10:21 PST 2014


Looks like the private option will be fine. Yes your api key provides
access to your private ontologies, search, etc. If you want more than one
person/application to access the private information, just put their user
name in the access control list for the private ontology.

Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Leinfelder [mailto:leinfelder at nceas.ucsb.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:00 AM
To: Ray Fergerson
Cc: support at bioontology.org
Subject: Re: [bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Benjamin
Leinfelder

Hi Ray,
I'm inclined to start with the first option and just keep our ontology
private.
I don't expect our UI development work to overload the services, but we
are also looking at using the recommender service for automated
classification If we end up doing too many queries, please let us know. 

I assume my API key will still allow me to interact with private
ontologies (find concept matches, navigate classes, etc)?
Thanks!
-ben

On Dec 9, 2014, at 5:46 PM, Ray Fergerson <ray.fergerson at stanford.edu>
wrote:

> There are two ways forward here. First you can load your ontology as 
> "private". Then only you and those you specify will be able to see it. 
> The second way is to set you your own virtual machine instance of
BioPortal.
> 
> If you are going to be (1) doing lots of queries or (2) making lots of 
> modification (notes & mappings) then the second method is preferable. 
> If not then you can use the first.
> 
> When the ontology is complete you can change it over to public if you 
> choose.
> 
> Ray
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bioontology-support
> [mailto:bioontology-support-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of 
> support at bioontology.org
> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 2:32 PM
> To: support at bioontology.org; leinfelder at nceas.ucsb.edu
> Subject: [bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Benjamin 
> Leinfelder
> 
> 
> Name: Benjamin Leinfelder
> 
> Email: leinfelder at nceas.ucsb.edu
> 
> Location: http://bioportal.bioontology.org/
> 
> Comment:
> I'm wondering if there's a development instance of BioPortal that 
> could be used for testing the API with some not-yet-finished 
> ontologies. We really like BioPortal and don't want to pollute the 
> holdings with works-in-progress.
> Thanks,
> -ben
> NCEAS software development
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bioontology-support mailing list
> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/bioontology-support
> 




More information about the bioontology-support mailing list