Search Mailing List Archives
[bioontology-support] Final Notice on NCBO BioPortal Old REST API Phaseout
ray.fergerson at stanford.edu
Thu Feb 27 15:39:03 PST 2014
I'm afraid that I am lost. I don't see that "include_synonyms" is listed
as a parameter on the search function documentation. Perhaps we are
looking at a different page... It is listed under the "resource index"
topic but this is entirely different.
From: Dan Bolser [mailto:dan.bolser at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:05 PM
To: Ray Fergerson
Cc: support at bioontology.org Support
Subject: Re: [bioontology-support] Final Notice on NCBO BioPortal Old REST
Why is it listed as a parameter on that page?
On 27 February 2014 22:52, Ray Fergerson <ray.fergerson at stanford.edu>
>> Most of the fields (like with/include_synonyms) aren't explicitly
>> documented here:
>> RWF: the fields that are there are documented. There is currently no
>> include_synonyms switch. You always get synonyms back (except for the
>> exact_match bug, described above).
> Where is include_synonyms documented? What does it do? Setting
> 'include_synonyms=false' doesn't seem to affect the fields returned...
> Is it changing what fields gets searched? You could document that...
> Actually, it doesn't even affect the number of results returned, so I
> can't even guess what it's doing.
> RWF: The reason that "include_synonyms" is not documented is that it
> does not exist. There is no such parameter in the new system. Search
> always looks at synonyms. Synonym matches appear lower in the search
> results than preferred name matches but they are there.
> If this behavior turns out to be a problem for some users then we may
> implement a "do not include synonyms" parameter. For the moment though
> no one has asked for one and we have no plans.
More information about the bioontology-support