Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Lori Phillips

Ray Fergerson ray.fergerson at stanford.edu
Wed Jun 4 16:41:08 PDT 2014


Nope, this is not what we should have. The owl:Thing parent is correct.
The other is a bogus node with no real function that should be removed. We
will fix this. The problem also appears in SNOMED.

Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: bioontology-support
[mailto:bioontology-support-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of
support at bioontology.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 2:52 PM
To: support at bioontology.org; lcphillips at partners.org
Subject: [bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Lori Phillips


Name: Lori Phillips

Email: lcphillips at partners.org

Location: http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/ICD10CM?p=classes

Comment:
Is this valid?  Term is both a root node (owl#Thing) and a child term?

http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/ICD10CM/?p=classes&conceptid=h
ttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.bioontology.org%2Fontology%2FICD10CM%2FM00-M99


_______________________________________________
bioontology-support mailing list
bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/bioontology-support


More information about the bioontology-support mailing list