Search Mailing List Archives
[bioontology-support] Bioportal Annotator
ray.fergerson at stanford.edu
Mon Oct 13 13:49:09 PDT 2014
I believe that this is fixed now, including he previously indicated
problem with "CD4". Now the matched terms for the text in the items below
all have synonyms that match the terms.
Let me know if you see other problematic cases.
[mailto:bioontology-support-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 10:45 AM
To: NCBO User Support
Subject: Re: [bioontology-support] Bioportal Annotator
Are there any results/news for the annotation problem?
Some more examples:
text to be annotated select ontologies class(result)
C-X-C MOTIF CHEMOKINE 11
MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR 1
PLATELET-DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR
The result classes are not correct. The text to be annotated does not
exist in classes' metadata.
From: Paul R Alexander [mailto:palexander at stanford.edu]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 6:31 PM
To: Sarantis, Demetrios
Cc: NCBO User Support
Subject: Re: Bioportal Annotator
I've CCed the NCBO Support email list here. It's always a good idea to
email that list with questions as there is a higher chance someone on the
list will provide an answer.
As for your problem, it appears as though this is a bug on our end. I've
submitted a ticket so that we can investigate the problem and we'll get
back to you.
On Sep 25, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Sarantis, Demetrios
<demetrios.sarantis at yale.edu> wrote:
Could you please check this issue for me with the Annotator?
It produces results which seem not have any relation with the inserted
Another example is CD4 (see picture). It produces three results that do
not contain CD4 in their metadata.
From: Sarantis, Demetrios
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 12:39 PM
To: 'Paul R Alexander'
Subject: Bioportal Annotator
I would like to ask you a basic question regarding the operation of
I insert in the text box IL-17, I select CYTO ontology and I press the
button 'Get Annotations'.
The results are 2 classes:
None of them has IL-17 in its metadata (synonym etc.) Why has annotator
produced those results? What is the annotation rationale?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bioontology-support