Search Mailing List Archives
[bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Nicolas Le Novere
rodriguezn at babraham.ac.uk
Fri Aug 28 01:56:09 PDT 2015
On 26/08/15 23:03, Ray Fergerson wrote:
> OK, I think that I know what went wrong. We have been updating all ontology sources to use the download link from the latest OBO Foundry "ontologies.txt" files. This file is available at:
> As you can see, this file indicates that the latest version of MAMO is downloadable at:
> In most cases for OBO ontologies, updating to the ontologies.txt download link is the right thing to do and gets the correct file. Perhaps for you this link is out of date for some reason.
Here is the correct link that should be used to always get the latest
release of mamo:
Could you replace the current version with this one ?
Is it enough to write it here to have the link updated in
do I have to write to an other email address.
> Best would be if you could provide us by email a URL where we could always get the latest version of MAMO. It would be wise to have the ontologies.txt file updated as well. This would require contacting the OBO team that manages this file. This later would prevent any additional confusion.
> If there is no URL for the latest version then we can shift you over to "manual" update and you can upload the file whenever you would like.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolas Le Novere [mailto:n.lenovere at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 2:48 PM
> To: Ray Fergerson; support at bioontology.org; Nicolas Rodriguez
> Subject: Re: [bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Nicolas Le Novere
> Dear Ray,
> It seems the OWL file has been chopped severely. You can see it by comparing the current one with the previous version. I am also a bit puzzled by the dates. Two submissions are dated "2015-04-18". But their upload dates are different. While one is indeed from 04/18/2015, the other is from 08/20/2015.
> I attach the latest version that should have been the one uploaded on 08/20/2015.
> (Nico, this is the one from the directory "tags/latest/mamo-xml.owl" Is this correct?)
> Best regards
> On 26/08/15 22:37, Ray Fergerson wrote:
>> After a small amount of poking around, I cannot see any problem. Can you point me to what is missing? Are there classes in the OWL file that are not being displayed? If so, can you name a couple?
>> [mailto:bioontology-support-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] *On Behalf Of
>> *support at bioontology.org
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2015 2:28 AM
>> *To:* support at bioontology.org; n.lenovere at gmail.com
>> *Subject:* [bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Nicolas Le
>> Name: Nicolas Le Novere
>> Email: n.lenovere at gmail.com <mailto:n.lenovere at gmail.com>
>> Location: http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/MAMO?p=classes
>> There is a problem with the parsing of the Mathematical Modelling
>> Ontology (MAMO)
>> Only some branches appear.
> Nicolas LE NOVERE, Babraham Institute, Babraham Campus Cambridge, CB22 3AT
> Tel: +441223496433, Mob:+447833147074, twitter:@lenovere, Skype:n.lenovere n.lenovere at gmail.com, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6309-7327
> http://lenoverelab.org/, http://lenoverelab.org/perso/lenov/
The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge CB22 3AT Registered Charity No. 1053902.
The information transmitted in this email is directed only to the addressee. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete this email from your system. The contents of this e-mail are the views of the sender and do not necessarily represent the views of the Babraham Institute. Full conditions at: www.babraham.ac.uk<http://www.babraham.ac.uk/terms>
More information about the bioontology-support