Search Mailing List Archives
[bioontology-support] [BioPortal] Feedback from Melissa Haendel
melissa at tislab.org
Mon Jun 24 19:09:57 PDT 2019
Nice to see you in my inbox.
We are seeing a lot of variability in the rankings. Also there are some outdated or never-used ontologies on the list higher than some we know are more widely used. Is it simply because of people landing there from Google?
This is an interesting question- how to monitor usage. I wonder what a longer period might look like, and/or by ontologies for which someone actually opens the graph or downloads the file?
For openly available ontologies, its a nice metric for popularity that we can use in our grants, but not if the ranking changes frequently and by a lot.
Anyway, there may well be nothing wrong, its just less useful for this purpose then?
Let me know if you want to brainstorm.
> On Jun 23, 2019, at 5:39 PM, John Graybeal <jgraybeal at stanford.edu> wrote:
> Hi Melissa,
> Can you help us with more precise details about your concern?
> Popularity based on ontology visits is seen on the front page and the ontology browse page (https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies <https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies>). These statistics change monthly based on Google metrics for page visits.
> The Recommender (https://bioportal.bioontology.org/recommender <https://bioportal.bioontology.org/recommender>) makes recommendations based on a number of factors, one of which is the visit-based popularity.
> Are you seeing a lot of variation in the Google visit rankings, and suggesting we should use a longer average of the Google visits metric? I know there can be significant month-to-month variation in the access statistics for some of these ontologies, as seen on their summary pages.
>> On Jun 22, 2019, at 4:29 PM, support at bioontology.org <mailto:support at bioontology.org> wrote:
>> Name: Melissa Haendel
>> Email: melissa at tislab.org <mailto:melissa at tislab.org>
>> Location: https%3A%2F%2Fbioportal.bioontology.org <http://2fbioportal.bioontology.org/>%2Fontologies
>> popularity ranking doesn't seem correct and seems to change daily. I think how it was earlier seemed to work better. A user usually wants to know how frequently a source is accessed, maybe do so over the past year or quarter, so that they don't jump around so much?
>> bioontology-support mailing list
>> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu <mailto:bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu>
> John Graybeal
> Technical Program Manager
> Center for Expanded Data Annotation and Retrieval /+/ NCBO BioPortal
> Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bioontology-support