Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[bioontology-support] Problem retrieving classes

Carlos Oscar Sorzano coss at cnb.csic.es
Sat Jul 25 01:13:41 PDT 2020


Thank you, Jennifer. I will check the configuration of Protege and see 
if I can save a truly OWL file. At least I have now something to look at.

Kind regards, Carlos Oscar

El 24/07/2020 a las 20:53, Jennifer Leigh Vendetti escribió:
> Hello Carlos Oscar,
>
> I looked at the contents of your ontology source file. You mentioned 
> that it’s an OWL file, but the contents appear to be in OBO format, 
> i.e., see the following snippet from the top of your ontology showing 
> OBO-style term stanzas:
>
> format-version: 1.2
> ontology: 
> http://www.semanticweb.org/coss/ontologies/2020/2/untitled-ontology-2
> owl-axioms: 
> Prefix(owl:=<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#>)\nPrefix(rdf:=<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>)\nPrefix(xml:=<http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace>)\nPrefix(xsd:=<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>)\nPrefix(rdfs:=<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>)\n\n\nOntology(\nDeclaration(AnnotationProperty(<http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#id>))\n\n\nAnnotationAssertion(<http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#id> 
> <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/http://www.semanticweb.org/coss/ontologies/2020/2/untitled-ontology-2#ProtMovies> 
> \"ProtProcessMovies\"^^xsd:string)\n)
>
> [Term]
> id: Acquisition
> comment: Contains acquisition parameters such as magnification, 
> voltage, spherical aberration, amplitude contrast, dose per frame and 
> inital dose, optics group, and beam tilt
> is_a: EMObject
>
> [Term]
> id: AtomStruct
> comment: File representing an atomic structure (PDB, mmCIF, ...)
> is_a: EMObject
> property_value: hasVolume "Volume"
>
> The first line indicates that the ontology file is written in OBO 
> format version 1.2, however the rest of the header tags aren’t valid 
> according to OBO file format documentation here:
>
> https://owlcollab.github.io/oboformat/doc/GO.format.obo-1_2.html#S.2.1
>
> Could you provide more detail about how this ontology was generated? 
> Do you have an OBO source file that you attempted to convert to a 
> different format using the Protege desktop application? Also, I do see 
> an error message in the Protege log when opening your ontology in the 
> desktop version (Window -> Show log…).
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Jennifer
>
>
>> On Jul 23, 2020, at 10:43 PM, Carlos Oscar Sorzano <coss at cnb.csic.es 
>> <mailto:coss at cnb.csic.es>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> I uploaded yesterday an ontology file for Cryo Electron Microscopy 
>> (http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/CRYOEM/?p=classes&conceptid=root). 
>> The OWL file was generated with Protege and it does not show any 
>> obvious error in Protege. However, when it is read at BioPortal there 
>> is some problem because we see the error message "Problem retrieving 
>> classes" (see previous link). The file is partly parsed because it 
>> shows some metrics, but we must have something wrong with the file. 
>> Could you help us with any hint?
>>
>> Kind regards and thanks, Carlos Oscar
>> _______________________________________________
>> bioontology-support mailing list
>> bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu 
>> <mailto:bioontology-support at lists.stanford.edu>
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/bioontology-support
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/bioontology-support/attachments/20200725/25a4cb29/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot 2020-07-24 11.52.33.png
Type: image/png
Size: 448373 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/bioontology-support/attachments/20200725/25a4cb29/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the bioontology-support mailing list