Search Mailing List Archives
[Gofriends] linguistic analysis of GO terms -- pigmentation
jane at ebi.ac.uk
Tue May 18 12:53:20 PDT 2010
Hi again Colleen - apologies, upon closer examination this turned out to
be more complicated than it looks.
So it looks like the 'pigment accumulation' term is supposed to describe
the aggregation of pigment within a pigment-containing cell - note that
the definition is rather misleading here becuase it talks about accumulation
'in an organism, tissue or cell' when in fact the accumulation within a
tissue or organism is just the result of the accumulation within
individual cells - more like a phenotypic observation.
The developmental pigmentation term describes the movement of the
pigment-containing cells themsleves to deposit pigment within a tissue or
organism (note that the definition here is misleading too: "The
developmental process that results in the deposition of coloring matter in
an organism, tissue or cell." - for a cell this process wouldn't be
So in summary, the defintions of these terms could do with looking at, but
in fact I think you are right, the distinction is being made bewteen
pigment deposition (developmental) and pigment accumulation
(physiological). I'm not entirely sure they warrant a common parent term
to be honest, as they don't really have much in common other that they
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Colleen E Crangle, Phd wrote:
> Hi Jane,
> Thanks for the clarification. Is an intended distinction being made
> between pigment aggregation and pigment deposition? Most of the time
> pigmentation-related terms in the ontology include the phrase
> "deposition or aggregation of coloring matter."
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jane Lomax
> To: Colleen E Crangle, Phd
> Cc: gofriends at genome.stanford.edu
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 2:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gofriends] linguistic analysis of GO terms -- pigmentation
> Hi Colleen - David is absolutely right - no such distinction is being
> made. I would say developmental pigmentation almost certainly involves
> some pigment aggregation, although this isn't stated in the ontology.
> Colleen E Crangle, Phd wrote:
> Dear GO friends,
> I'm doing a linguistic analysis of biological process terms in GO and, as a non-biologist, have encountered a puzzle in some terms related to pigmentation.
> GO:0043473 : pigmentation: The deposition or aggregation of coloring matter in an organism, tissue or cell
> GO:0048066 : developmental pigmentation: The developmental process that results in the deposition of coloring matter in an organism, tissue or cell.
> GO:0043476 : pigment accumulation: The aggregation of coloring matter in a particular location in an organism, tissue or cell, occurring in response to some external stimulus.
> Pigment accumulation, a process that is in response to some external stimulus, is differentiated from developmental pigmentation, driven presumably by internal cues. These processes, however, are further differentiated by coloring matter being aggregated in the first and deposited, not aggregated, in the second. Depositing and aggregating coloring matter differ in their verbal aspect--this is what interests me here.
> So my question is: Is it really not possible for pigment aggregation to play any role in developmental pigmentation or for pigment deposition to play any role in response to external stimuli? Is this distinction intended?
> The subtype processes under developmental pigmentation (cuticle, eye, and sex-specific pigmentation) give no clue and have their own aspectual problems.
> I'd appreciate any thoughts.
> Gofriends mailing list
> Gofriends at geneontology.org
Dr Jane Lomax
GO Editorial Office
Wellcome Trust Genome Campus
p: +44 1223 492516
f: +44 1223 494468
More information about the go-friends