Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[go-friends] NIH RFI on Strategic Plan for Data Science: Database vs Knowledge base

Valerie Wood vw253 at cam.ac.uk
Tue Mar 6 12:40:04 PST 2018


I agree Chris, but this seems so obvious an error that its possibly just 
a mistake that requires correction?

v.

On 06/03/2018 19:56, Chris Mungall wrote:
>
> The NIH has put at an RFI together with a draft strategic plan:
> https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-18-134.html
>
> I want to draw people's attention to p10 of the report
>
> /"NIH will distinguish between *databases* and *knowledgebases* (see 
> text box “Databases and Knowledgebases: What’s the Difference?”) and 
> will *support each separately from one another*"/
>
> OK, this is interesting. But caution advised, these are two pretty 
> squishy terms that are used differently by different communities. For 
> those of us with an AI background, "databases" are typically closer to 
> the raw data, are curated at the level of metadata rather than data, 
> whereas "knowledge bases" contain curated generalizations of the data. 
> GO is a classic knowledge base (or Knowledge Graph, now that google 
> has made that trendy). However it's historically been called a 
> "database" since that is the term the community normally uses.
>
> Anyway, the distinction that the NIH makes in the report (box at 
> bottom of p10 of the report) doesn't make any sense to me:
>
>   * an example of what might be in a database is /"functional
>     annotations of gene products"/
>   * an example of what might be in a knowledgebase is
>     /"protein-protein interaction networks"/
>
> To me this is precisely reversed. PPI networks are often raw data, 
> e.g. coIP. A functional annotation is as absolutely paradigmatic case 
> of knowledge as you could wish for.
>
> Normally I save terminological minutiae such as "what's the difference 
> between an ontology and terminology" to the bar or to the filing 
> cabinet marked Pointless Discussions We Used To Have In The Early Days 
> of GO. However, if the NIH is going to make important funding 
> decisions based on a difference between "Database" and "Knowledge 
> Base", it's crucial that we educate them. This is important for GO 
> (and for other knowledge databases/repositories/resources/whatever you 
> want to call them). Given that functional annotation is explicitly 
> called out in the draft report, I think this calls for a specific 
> response from the entire GO community.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> go-friends mailing list
> go-friends at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-friends


-- 
University of Cambridge
PomBase http://www.pombase.org/
Cambridge Systems Biology Centre http://www.sysbiol.cam.ac.uk/Investigators/val-wood

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/go-friends/attachments/20180306/a57704e7/attachment.html>


More information about the go-friends mailing list