Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[Ontology-editors] XPs

Chris Mungall cjm at berkeleybop.org
Thu Mar 4 18:08:21 PST 2010


if the regulates cross-product definitions are working out well and  
saving time, should we push ahead with some additional internal cross- 
product definitions?

I forget which one we decided next, perhaps one of

- process-specific functions
- bp_xp_self (part_of only)
- cc_xp_self (part_of only)
- bp_xp_cc (occurs_in only)

I know the NIF folks would like to us to push ahead with the cc ones,  
and it would make things easier to stay in sync with them



More information about the go-ontology mailing list