Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[liberationtech] btw, the itu imploded

Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.org
Fri Dec 14 12:58:02 PST 2012


----- Forwarded message from Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> -----

From: Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:32:02 +0000
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: btw, the itu imploded
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0

On 14/12/2012 19:51, Mike A wrote:
> Yep. _Gloriously_! The US walked out, followed by bunchty others. 
> 
> <http://www.pcworld.com/article/2020469/opponents-say-itu-treaty-threatens-internet-freedom.html>

The ITU didn't implode and that article gives a ridiculously misleading
impression of what happened.  The BBC gives a more balanced viewpoint:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20717774

There's some stuff up on some US news channels (ABC, etc), but some of the
larger players (CNN, NY Times + others) haven't actually woken up to the
extent of this tech/political landgrab, and have no recent articles on the
outcome or the political importance of it.

What actually happened is that the ITU ignored their previous promises not
to have a vote on the ITRs.  When a vote was finally called because it was
apparently that there was no general consensus on the articles, 77
countries voted in favour and 33 voted against, causing the treaty to start
the process of becoming legally binding in those countries which voted in
favour.

The current positions are here:

http://files.wcitleaks.org/public/S12-WCIT12-C-0066!!MSW-E.pdf
http://files.wcitleaks.org/public/S12-WCIT12-C-0067!!MSW-E.pdf

Many countries are formally sitting on the fence, including pretty much
every country in Europe which didn't walk out - also enjoy the spat in
declarations #4 (argentina) and #93 (UK).

Now that this landgrab has succeeded in large chunks of the world, the
ITU's position has consolidated, although not nearly to the extent that had
originally been envisaged in the draft ITRs.  I don't forsee this debate
dying any time soon.

Nick


----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE



More information about the liberationtech mailing list