Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[liberationtech] Web cams in polling stations/helpful?

Luke Allnutt AllnuttL at rferl.org
Mon Feb 13 06:38:32 PST 2012


Thanks, Griffin, that's a good point. Obviously there are degrees here: so 
for instance, a well-positioned camera showing people's backs would be 
better than a camera in the actual polling both. So in that sense 
well-positioned cameras _might_ have a lesser impact on privacy. 

What isn't clear is how much pscyological impact the presence of cameras 
would have on voters. I wonder if their presence, even if they were 
discretely angled, might still have an intimidating effect....





Griffin Boyce <griffinboyce at gmail.com> 
02/13/2012 01:58 PM

To
Luke Allnutt <AllnuttL at rferl.org>
cc
liberationtech at mailman.stanford.edu
Subject
Re: [liberationtech] Web cams in polling stations/helpful?






Hi Luke,

  It might be a question of angle, and whether voters' privacy can be 
protected in that environment.  Pointing it at, say, the entrance to 
private voting booths would be better than having a webcam pointed in 
voters' faces, in terms of minimizing vote influence.

Griffin Boyce


On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Luke Allnutt <AllnuttL at rferl.org> wrote:

Dear All, 

I'm looking into the question of whether having web cams in polling 
stations is a positive for transparency and fair elections. The story is 
related to Russia's plans to install web cameras in polling stations 
across Russia for the March presidential election. 

http://blogs.wsj.com/emergingeurope/2012/02/06/russia-launches-election-monitoring-website/ 


Obviously, Russia is a special case. Even if the web cams did provide 
transparency, there are enough other factors that put the fairness of the 
election into question: e.g. skewed media, workers being asked to vote en 
masse etc. In my opinion, this endeavor ties into the Kremlin's use of 
technology to present a facade of progress and transparency, without 
giving up much in terms of real democratization. 

But I'm more interested in whether, across the world, this is something 
that the election monitoring community thinks is a good thing and whether 
it aids transparency? 

In some societies, surely, the presence of a web cam in a polling station 
would be unwelcome: people might feel they are being watched by their 
government/friends/employers and that would influence their voting. 

If anyone has any thoughts on this matter, on list or off list, I would 
love to pick your brains for the story.  Any help would be much 
appreciated, as ever. 

Best Wishes, 

Luke 
RFE/RL 
@lukeallnutt 






_______________________________________________
liberationtech mailing list
liberationtech at lists.stanford.edu

Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to:

https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click 
above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily 
digest?"

You will need the user name and password you receive from the list 
moderator in monthly reminders.

Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator.

Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech



-- 
"I believe that usability is a security concern; systems that do 
not pay close attention to the human interaction factors involved 
risk failing to provide security by failing to attract users."
~Len Sassaman

PGP Key etc: https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/User:Fontaine 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/attachments/20120213/b1fdd221/attachment.html>


More information about the liberationtech mailing list