Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[liberationtech] Assange's claim about Tor losing US government support due to WikiLeaks

Fran Parker lilbambi at gmail.com
Sun Feb 19 12:23:02 PST 2012


Thanks for that clarification Andrew

On 2/19/12 2:37 PM, liberationtech at lewman.us wrote:
> : I was a bit puzzled by it. So were people at
> : Cryptome<http://cryptome.org/2012/01/0053.htm>,
> : who asked Tor about it. Here is what Andrew Lewman (who's on this list)
> : wrote to them:
>
> To be clear, two other news organizations were as well, but only Cryptome
> published something.
>
> : Now, Andrew's statement is carefully worded, i.e. it does allow for the
> : possibility that Tor lost the USG money but they think it was not
> : Jacob/WikiLeaks-related.
>
> Yes, it was carefully worded. It was cryptome after all. Generally, the
> journalists were looking for some drama-filled story where there is none.
>
> : So it would be good to know whether a) Tor did lose some or all of USG
> : support between late 2010 and early 2012? and b) there is any evidence to
> : link this to WL, as Assange did?
>
> Tor did not lose existing funding. We applied for some funding right
> around the time when Jacob's volunteer activities with wikileaks were in
> the news. We did not get the funding. The lack of funding the proposal
> was not attributed to 'wikileaks', but rather lack of sufficient funds.
>
> I'm taking it at face value that we applied for some funding near the
> end of a fiscal year and were denied because there wasn't enough money
> in the budget to fund the project.
>
> : Whatever the motivation, USG cutting support to circumvention tools is a
> : big news item all in itself, regardless of the link to Assange. I wonder
> : why it wasn't more widely reported, if true - perhaps, by Tor project
> : itself?-  because ultimately this would all be visible on Tor's financial
> : statements.
>
> We just started our 2011 audit, so in a few months we'll have something
> for public release.
>



More information about the liberationtech mailing list