Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[liberationtech] Finishing what Aaron Swartz started with PACER

Gregory Foster gfoster at entersection.org
Mon Jan 21 23:39:46 PST 2013


I looked into Aaron Greenspan's proposed Operation Asymptote, and I 
wanted to recommend it as an effective and poetic tribute to Aaron 
Swartz's memory.  Here's some background on how it works.

"PACER" stands for Public Access to Court Electronic Records.  It's a 
network of servers hosting case and docket information from federal 
district, bankruptcy, and appellate courts.
http://www.pacer.gov/

As far as open government history is concerned, PACER was ahead of its 
time, initially providing terminal access in libraries and office 
buildings as early as 1988, then moving to the web in 2001.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PACER_(law)

Its network architecture and system design have not kept pace with the 
times.  Neither has its fee structure, which was increased to $0.10 per 
page in September 2011.  Charges are even applied to search results, 
where a page is defined as 4,320 bytes.  I suppose one could argue it 
makes sense that the Administrative Office of the United States Courts 
should charge a nominal fee for documents which are in the public domain 
if you consider the cost of running and securing the service, maybe even 
upgrading it now and then.  But that's not what the fees are exclusively 
used for.  In fact, PACER makes a sizable profit and some of those funds 
are used in a slushy way by the U.S. Courts, enabling at least one court 
to purchase flat screen LCDs and audio speakers installed in court benches:
http://managingmiracles.blogspot.com/2010/05/what-is-electronic-public-access-to.html

What other options are out there for accessing federal case law? Open 
government pioneer Carl Malamud says commercial ventures such as 
Lexis-Nexis, West Law, and Bloomberg Law compete for a $6.5 billion 
market built around extracting rents from this public commons:

> Countless government lawyers, public interest lawyers, and solo 
> practitioners are quick to point out that they are priced out of the 
> market and cannot afford access to the tools they need for their job. 
> For the rest of us, the law truly has been locked up behind a cash 
> register, affordable only to those who can pay the enormous price. We 
> are a nation of laws, but the laws are not publicly available. This is 
> a fundamental issue for democracy, for if we are a nation of laws, we 
> must be able to consult the cases and codes of our government.

https://public.resource.org/uscourts.gov/index.html


This brings to mind something important Jacob Appelbaum said the other day:

> The old phrase "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" really rings hollow 
> in an era of secret law.

https://twitter.com/ioerror/status/291357557577117698


The PACER system excludes a segment of the public as well as law 
practitioners who cannot afford access to the case law, which enforces 
its own form of ignorance.  When Aaron Swartz met Steve Schultze in 2008 
and learned about the PACER system, it seems he recognized an injustice 
and decided to do something about it.  And as seems emblematic of what I 
have learned of Aaron Swartz's ways, he outsmarted an institution with 
the assistance of technology. Here's Steve Schultze's description of 
meeting Aaron Swartz, the idea for a "Thumb Drive Corps" to liberate 
PACER documents from 16 public libraries temporarily granted free 
access, and Aaron Swartz's automation of that process so he could 
download 2.7 million files in two days:
http://blog.law.cornell.edu/voxpop/2011/02/03/pacer-recap-and-the-movement-to-free-american-case-law/

Steve's post also describes the provenance of the technology underlying 
Aaron Greenspan's proposed Operation Asymptote, the RECAP Firefox plugin.

> I called up one of the authors [of the paper "Government Data and the 
> Invisible Hand"], Ed Felten, and he told me to come down to Princeton 
> to give a talk about PACER. Afterwards, two graduate students, Harlan 
> Yu and Tim Lee, came up to me and made an interesting suggestion. They 
> proposed a Firefox extension that anyone using PACER could install. As 
> users paid for documents, those documents would automatically be 
> uploaded to a public archive. As users browsed dockets, if any 
> documents were available for free, the system would notify them of 
> that, so that the users could avoid charges. It was a beautiful 
> quid-pro-quo, and a way to crowdsource the PACER liberation effort in 
> a way that would build on the existing document set.


As a result, we have the RECAP collection at The Internet Archive which 
as of this writing consists of 851,083 items:
http://archive.org/details/usfederalcourts

Here's the RECAP website where you can install the plugin, or browse the 
archive:
https://www.recapthelaw.org/
http://archive.recapthelaw.org/

And here's the next piece of the puzzle:

> The Judicial Conference of the United States approved a measure in 
> March 2010 stating that you will not owe a [PACER] fee unless your 
> account accrues more than $10.00 of usage in a given quarter. In 
> September 2011, this amount was increased to $15.00. If you accrue 
> less than $15.00, your fees are waived for that quarter and your 
> billing statement will have a zero balance. This policy change will be 
> effective for the July 2012 statement.

http://www.pacer.gov/psc/faq.html


So that means that any individual using PACER can download 150 pages 
every quarter for free.  If you use the RECAP plugin while you are doing 
it, those pages are automatically uploaded to the Internet Archive where 
they become true public records without having to do anything except 
click on a link.  Here's the PACER registration page, where you will 
need a credit card to set up an account but don't necessarily have to be 
charged fees:
https://www.pacer.gov/psco/cgi-bin/regform.pl

Don't know what to download?  That's where Aaron Greenspan's Project 
Asymptote and his public access law website PlainSite can help.  As he 
explains in his post announcing the project, Aaron Greenspan wanted to 
find out all about Assistant United States Attorney Stephen P. Heymann, 
who played a role in prosecuting Aaron Swartz's case.  And he did.  
Here's all of Heymann's cases:
http://www.plainsite.org/flashlight/attorney.html?id=73864&table=attorneycases

Now he wants to make "every U.S. Attorney and AUSA's full career as a 
prosecutor available to the public to examine in its entirety." So those 
are the links queued up in Project Asymptote.  Register with PACER, 
start Firefox w/ RECAP installed, navigate to the Operation Asymptote 
site, and begin clicking links till you reach $15 in charges, which you 
won't be charged for.
http://www.plainsite.org/asymptote/index.html

That's what you might call poetic justice.
gf



On 1/19/13 7:13 PM, Aaron Greenspan wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> In case anyone is interested, I've built a tool to crowdsource the downloading of PACER materials. You can find details here:
>
> http://www.aarongreenspan.com/writing/essay.html?id=85
> http://www.plainsite.org/asymptote/index.html
>
> Please help spread the word!
>
> Aaron
>
> Aaron Greenspan
> CodeX Fellow | Stanford Center for Legal Informatics | http://codex.stanford.edu
> Founder | PlainSite | http://www.plainsite.org

-- 
Gregory Foster || gfoster at entersection.org
@gregoryfoster <> http://entersection.com/




More information about the liberationtech mailing list