Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[liberationtech] Fwd: [jitsi-users] New XMPP Server

Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb ei8fdb at ei8fdb.org
Sun Jul 28 05:38:32 PDT 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 28 Jul 2013, at 13:21, John Perry wrote:

> On 7/28/2013 6:44 AM, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
>> For those interested, these two forwarded mails mention two
>> separate "secure" Jabber servers with "no-logging". I cannot vouch
>> for the validity of them.
>> 
>> IMO, any alternative to running the now closed (as in no non-GTalk
>> users can talk directly) Google Talk service.
>> 
>> regards, Bernard
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: John Perry <lists at jpunix.net> Date: 28 July 2013 09:21:23
>>> GMT+01:00 To: Jitsi Users <users at jitsi.org> Subject: Re:
>>> [jitsi-users] New XMPP Server Reply-To: Jitsi Users
>>> <users at jitsi.org>
>> 
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>>> On 7/27/2013 5:44 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>>>> I know that Emil has stated that the jit.si server is an 
>>>> experimental one and, with the developed focused on making the 
>>>> Jisti software even more kick butt, it's probably a bit hard
>>>> for them to constantly troubleshoot server and config problems
>>>> with the service.
>>>> 
>>>> So I've set up a similar service at http://patts.us and invite 
>>>> anyone interested to use it. We support voice, video, and IM
>>>> and run a Jingle node. We are also completely unlogged (even
>>>> the web server).
>>>> 
>>>> Just putting it out there to anyone who's interested. Not
>>>> trying to poach users from the jit.si service. Hopefully, this
>>>> will give Emil and the team a little breathing room.
>>>> 
>>>> Best Regards, Anthony Papilloon
>> 
>>> I don't want to steal any of Anthony's thunder but I also have a 
>>> server located at xmpp://chat.jpunix.net that has no logging and 
>>> pretty much does what Anthony's does and is open to anyone that
>>> want's to use it.
>> 
>>> - -- John Perry
> 
> 
> I want to clarify the "secure" part of my server. It is "secure" in
> the regard that it is my own server that I have physical access to
> (it's in my house). It doesn't have any logging turned on and I have
> no intention of turning it on. Anyone is welcome to use it that cares
> to. As far as my trustworthiness goes you are welcome to Google
> jpunix.net and jpunix.com to see the history of my domain and my
> participation in privacy and security issues.

Hi John,

Apologies if my comment sound insulting. It was not meant to be, more just matter-of-fact - I had no knowledge of how secure/insecure your service was, and therefore didn't want to sound like I had any assurances.

I was going for healthy skepticism as opposed to disbelief. Not sure if I succeeded.

IMO everyone should run their own Jabber server at home. It'd not that difficult.

regards,
Bernard






- --------------------------------------
Bernard / bluboxthief / ei8fdb

IO91XM / www.ei8fdb.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR9RDIAAoJENsz1IO7MIrrm3wIAMhU1HwHte3CPbQ8JqLOMWhX
4DuZ0HD7yv5SW+6MwHrPEc/9B3GuIrnWPQs+8aQpAtkRx36b1p7QXIi49HfzSsaY
Mu35h0L5fZdYVjhxy4WuC/g/+Dlyu+QmSsZTJbBvPWuLevttKrD7vVhTrzkKHMre
eYSMkoxuiaiNq9guUaSTQDQW/cCDCk5/UEZptYQSOKXtdZpz8AE6zMS4nvcvA0+0
l4kgtkpuPwd68xQ42ZFeyBFKZ+XcCLB9Ng8KlIiCDWOGdSACO6avar+zf3phu0+P
8M0OxNHpWJQLnemknW1yGULpb9VtwnzJHDnL5xE7TLYyiWQSEWnmZxf7KDR3FY8=
=crVL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the liberationtech mailing list