Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[liberationtech] Please Vote on "Reply to" Question

Joanne Michele sabzbrach at gmail.com
Thu Mar 21 09:23:49 PDT 2013


I vote to retain reply-to-all. 
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Yosem Companys <companys at stanford.edu>
wrote:

> Dear Liberationtech list subscribers,
> Several of you have petitioned to change Liberationtech mailing list's
> default "reply to" option from "reply-to-all" to "reply-to-poster."  Given
> the debate (see links below), we have decided to put the issue up for a
> vote:
>    - Do you want replies to Liberationtech list messages directed to
>    "reply-to-all" or "reply-to-poster"?
> Please vote by submitting your preference to me by 11.59 pm PST on Sunday,
> March 24, 2013.  Any votes received after this date and time will not be
> counted.
> Thanks,
> Yosem
> One of your moderators
> PS  To read a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of
> "reply-to-all", click on the corresponding links below:
>    - Reply-to-all considered useful:
>    http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
>    - Reply-to-all considered harmful:
>    http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> If you'd like to read the entire debate on the Liberationtech list, please
> click on the links below:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03767.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03768.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03769.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03771.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03772.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03773.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03774.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03775.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03776.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03777.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03778.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03779.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03780.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03781.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03782.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03783.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03788.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03789.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03790.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03791.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03799.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03801.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/attachments/20130321/5d71135b/attachment.html>


More information about the liberationtech mailing list