Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[liberationtech] Vote results on "Reply to" Question

Yosem Companys companys at stanford.edu
Thu Mar 28 10:02:21 PDT 2013


We voted on #2 because that was the issue Joseph Lorenzo Hall raised (see:
http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03767.html).
 He specifically asked for the following:

Has the possibility of reconfiguring libtech to not reply-all by default
> been
> broached? Maybe I'm the only one that trips over it so often. best, Joe


FYI, the list settings are configured as follows:

>   (1) Should any existing Reply-To: header found in the original message
>       be stripped?  If so, this will be done regardless of whether an
>       explicit Reply-To: header is added by Mailman or not.
>
>        - No
>
>   (2) Where are replies to list messages directed?  Poster is
>       *strongly* recommended for most mailing lists.
>
>         - This list

Best,

Yosem
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/attachments/20130328/7305514f/attachment.html>


More information about the liberationtech mailing list