Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[liberationtech] Vote results on "Reply to" Question

Andrés Leopoldo Pacheco Sanfuentes alps6085 at
Sat Mar 30 20:49:18 PDT 2013

Amén! I just find it ridiculous to apply red-phone rules to lists that ate
On Mar 30, 2013 10:25 PM, "Maxim Kammerer" <mk at> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Eugen Leitl <eugen at> wrote:
> > Failure, actually. It shows that democratic decisions
> > tend to produce technically suboptimal results.
> The vote in this case shows that majority of subscribers value their
> convenience more than cool stories of someone's past stupidity or
> settings guidelines from, of all things, GNU software. To most people,
> it is pretty clear that convenience * number of users > some contrived
> case of someone getting hurt due to not thinking before doing
> something — an intuitive economic argument that somehow eludes people
> who value SMTP headers over what users actually want.
> > That the whole list was spammed with voting traffic
> > just adds insult to injury -- Dunning-Kruger in
> > action.
> It is pretty clear that people wanted their opinion to be known. Just
> asking for something (individual replies in case of this vote) doesn't
> mean that everyone will comply. Don't assume that you are smarter than
> everyone else just because you are better versed in technical aspects
> of some issue.
> --
> Maxim Kammerer
> Liberté Linux:
> --
> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
> emailing moderator at companys at or changing your settings at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the liberationtech mailing list