Search Mailing List Archives
[liberationtech] NYTimes and Guardian on NSA
railmeat at gmail.com
Fri Sep 6 10:28:04 PDT 2013
You wrote: "...the president essentially struck down posse comitatus
in May, they won't know what you are talking about..." I don't know
what you are talking about either, but I am curious. Could you send a
link or two.
-- Matt Johnson
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Shava Nerad <shava23 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Part of the tone is also adopted in order to wake the sleeping baby
> anti-intellectual giants either side of the pond. The smart magazines can
> publish smart crypto articles, but mass market newspapers have to bring
> their audiences along, even the Times and Guardian.
> Very few stories even bother to explain what the NSA does or what its
> function in government is, which actually rather stuns me, because I find
> that when I ask the general public that question I find that most of them
> don't know what the NSA does for the government. Most of them assume it
> works for the executive branch, but for the DOJ as part of the whole
> civilian/State/FBI sort of DHS bits, because those lines are so muddied.
> (And yes, I am conflating Justice and State on purpose there because it's
> been done in conversation with The (Wo)Man on the Street.).
> People don't know basic civics. At all. If you tell them they should be
> upset because the military is conducting domestic surveillance, they look at
> you like "what?" "East Germany?" you say. "Stasi?" you say. Blank looks.
> No history. Those who do not learn from history, etc.
> If you tell them that they should be upset because the president essentially
> struck down posse comitatus in May, they won't know what you are talking
> about, but if you say, "Basically, if a local SWAT team decides they need
> backup in some kind of emergency situation and they can't get hold of the
> governor to call for National Guard? They can call a local military airbase
> for an airstrike if they want to." Then the people will decide you are
> cold stoned mad and a total tin hat. "Sherman?" you say. And if they're
> from the south, they might go off in a rant, but they still won't relate it
> to current affairs or do anything. But that is literally what the law says
> in the US now. That's a bit beyond elementary civics, but it's a bit beyond
> what the press is reporting on here too. Because the press doesn't really
> have much literacy in elementary civics or history either. They seem to be
> drawing mostly on marcom majors these days.
> This is what the "attention economy" has done to us. Our culture is a deep,
> nutrient rich ocean, full of wonders and cthonic monsters that can eat us.
> And we all surf. Nothing below the surf-ace is important anymore.
> On Sep 5, 2013 3:31 PM, "Richard Brooks" <rrb at acm.org> wrote:
>> Latest articles:
>> I find most of this (if not all) silly. They seem shocked that the
>> NSA does cryptanalysis. It would be nice if the newspapers had
>> people with some knowledge of the domain writing articles.
>> Liberationtech is a public list whose archives are searchable on Google.
>> Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated:
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe,
>> change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
>> companys at stanford.edu.
> Liberationtech is a public list whose archives are searchable on Google.
> Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated:
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe,
> change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
> companys at stanford.edu.
More information about the liberationtech