Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[liberationtech] Decentralization

Andrés Pacheco alps6085 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 7 04:06:05 PST 2017


Signore Camozzo hit the nail on the head, twice. So then I have to draw the proper conclusion...

1. We need concerted action to set non-proprietary communication standards at the application level, much like the TCP-IP Protocols did for the lower layer(s)

2. This action HAS to be POLITICAL, since it's not just a matter of devising technical standards, but to have them ADOPTED by the majority. We need the 75% of his email correspondents to not use proprietary email platforms (and so forth and so on, and including me and this email itself!)

Ergo, it is at best naive trying to separate "Technology" from "Politics:" all Technology is Political, and ignoring this only rubber stamps the technology of the proprietary powers that be.

Not by chance it's Technology companies at the top of the "most valuable company of the world" food chain: Google and Apple. If that's not a political statement, then what is? Where is "the swamp?"

Regards | Saludos,

Andrés Leopoldo Pacheco Sanfuentes
<alps at acm.org>

> On Feb 7, 2017, at 5:34 AM, Alberto Cammozzo <ac+lists at zeromx.net> wrote:
> 
> So far so good, but what is it all for? ~75% of my email correspondents
> use Gmail ...
> You cant decentralize alone...
> We need to fix this quickly or the information revolution will be lost
> and archived as an annex of the industrial revolution.



More information about the liberationtech mailing list