Search Mailing List Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[liberationtech] Plan for a New Liberationtech, 2.0

Jose Luis Mendoza Marquez jluismendoza at
Sat Sep 8 08:17:45 PDT 2018

>From Venezuela receive with emotion an endorsement and a good time for your
admirable work. We are a small NGO dedicated to digital literacy and that
strongly believes that the internet has the opportunities we need as a
country to overcome our crisis. Years ago I am a member of the list
personally and I continue with emotion the evolution that they are living

José Luis Mendoza Márquez
FingerPrint PGP=745D AA77 13EA 6E08 1C6E C120 E6BE 5999 CED5 DCB6

El vie., 7 de sep. de 2018 a la(s) 17:52, Peter Lindener (
lindener.peter at escribió:

>     May I suggest that the new Lib tech wed site support a forum to
> support discussion about vote tallying methods.   More explicitly, a
> properly moderated forum focused on proposal of methods based upon
> mechanism design's Revelation principle...   such as to harden against
> strategic manipulation, instead incentivizing truthful (VNM_utility)
> preference ballot input.
>    Since it is not uncommon for electoral method discussion forums to
> become congested with
> a fair amount of "social choice gobbledy gook" that could easily obscure
> the finer, more relevant issues properly addressed by way of Strategic
> Voting Game Theoretic Mechanism design..
>    It would seem prudent to proactively structure this Voting Tallying
> method form such that a new reader, can more easily discern solid
> development in ranked choice voting system theory.
>    Along the above mentioned form on (strategically automated) vote
> tallying methods.
> It might also be good to support discussions about Expertise leveraging
> forms of issue specific, individualized proxy rule based (liquid)
> representation.
>    all the best
>         -Peter
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:56 PM Yosem Companys <ycompanys at> wrote:
>> Below is the amended plan for the new Liberationtech based on your
>> feedback. Should you have any questions, please let me know.
>>    - *Corporate Governance: Fiscal Sponsorship, NOT Legal Status*. Most
>>    of you recommended that we not incorporate legally as a 501(c)3 at this
>>    time. Instead, you recommended that we use a fiscal sponsor instead. A
>>    number of fiscal sponsors were proposed including Creative Commons; the
>>    Electronic Frontier Foundation; Freedom House; the Free Software
>>    Foundation; the Information Ethics and Equity Institute; Mozilla; Oasis;
>>    the Open Source Institute; the Public Sphere Project; the Puerto Rico
>>    Science, Technology, and Research Trust; the Renewable Freedom Foundation
>>    in Germany; Software Freedom Conservancy; and Wikimedia. There is also the
>>    Tides Foundation. The advantage of fiscal sponsors is that they can accept
>>    charitable contributions on behalf of Liberationtech and take care of the
>>    legal and accounting requirements needed to maintain the organization,
>>    thereby freeing Liberationtech to pursue its vision and mission. We have
>>    decided to find fiscal sponsors for different legal jurisdictions to ensure
>>    that we have a global presence. [Down the line, the Sustainable Economies
>>    Law Center was proposed as an organization to help Liberationtech
>>    incorporate as a 501(c)3.]
>>    - *Vision*. To research, design, and implement technologies for
>>    social good, especially for privacy and security.
>>    - *Mission*. To create and support a community of practice around
>>    technology for social good that incorporates privacy and security by
>>    design.
>>    - *Hosting Service*. Most of you expressed concerns about hosting in
>>    the U.S. and asked that Liberationtech use the most privacy- and
>>    security-friendly legal jurisdiction instead. Most of you also
>>    recommended Greenhost.
>>    - *Website Design and Development*. Some of you kindly offered to
>>    work on a pro bono basis to design and develop the Liberationtech website.
>>    Others suggested contacting groups such as the Agile Collective, Aspiration
>>    Technologies, CoTech, Digital Life Collective,, and Greenhost
>>    for these services. What should the website have? You asked that we keep
>>    the Liberationtech website simple. Beyond a basic description and a list of
>>    the board of advisers, you asked that we do the following:
>>       - *Keep It Simple Stupid (KISS)*. Most of you asked that we build
>>       a site that is as simple as possible so that it may be viewed even by those
>>       who have slow devices or weak bandwidth.
>>       - *Just a mailing list, please*. Most of you also asked that we
>>       only use open-source mailing list software that has been around for a long
>>       time for convenience (i.e., you get the email in your inbox) or security
>>       reasons and to make it easier for any list subscriber to download the list
>>       or port it from one device to another.
>>       - *Use Matrix and/or Discourse*. Enough of you feel passionate
>>       enough about using Matrix and/or Discourse beyond the basic mailing list
>>       capabilities that we've decided to do so.
>>       - *Let me create my own list, please*. Many of you asked that we
>>       allow list subscribers to create their own lists around specific subjects,
>>       whether by chapter (read more below), geography, sector, or topic. For
>>       example, some of you asked that Calls for Papers (CfPs), jobs, and
>>       announcements be moved to separate mailing lists.
>>       - *Make the site mobile*. Self-explanatory.
>>       - *Mirror it*. Many of you asked that we mirror the site at a
>>       number of locations for security reasons.
>>    - *Incubation*. Because we've decided to continue to research,
>>    design, and implement technologies for social good that incorporate
>>    privacy- and security-by-design, we aim to raise funds to become an
>>    incubator of technology for social good, where the funds would go to
>>    support the development of projects based on the ideas the community likes
>>    the most. We'll also try to incubate student projects on tech for social
>>    good that could be sponsored by companies to help students get jobs
>>    post-graduation.
>>    - *Directory*. Some of you suggested that we create a wiki (or
>>    similar) with tips, good practices, tools, and apps for secure
>>    communication and digital privacy, along with a list of the organizations
>>    and platforms that work in the technology for social good space.
>>    - *Funding*. Some of you suggested that Liberationtech contact
>>    foundations such as Omidyar and the Open Technology Fund. Others suggested
>>    that Liberationtech engage in crowdfunding. Yet others suggested charging a
>>    yearly fee for people to create their own Liberationtech chapters in
>>    geographies around the world.
>> One question that lingers is the following:
>>    - What is the key differentiator of Liberationtech vis-a-vis other
>>    existing groups, organizations, and/or sites in the space?
>> If any of you want to take a stab at answering the question, please do
>> so.
>> Otherwise, Gonzalo and I will be more than happy to do a review of the
>> field and try to answer that question in a more explicit manner.
>> Thanks,
>> Yosem
>> --
>> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations
>> of list guidelines will get you moderated:
>> Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing the moderator
>> at zakwhitt at
> --
> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations
> of list guidelines will get you moderated:
> Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing the moderator
> at zakwhitt at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the liberationtech mailing list