Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[p4-feedback] Possible bug in OWLDoc or my understanding

Nick Drummond nick.drummond at cs.manchester.ac.uk
Wed Apr 1 08:21:08 PDT 2009


Fixed.

A new version is available [1].
It says build 110+ but will work on 109 - one of the fixes is dependent on
the next release of P4 but it will be better than the current version.

Nick

[1]
http://code.google.com/p/co-ode-owl-plugins/downloads/detail?name=org.coode.owldoc_1_0_9.zip&can=2&q=#makechanges

2009/4/1 Nick Drummond <nick.drummond at cs.manchester.ac.uk>

> Hi,
>
> This is a bug in OWLDoc.
> Just looking into this now.
>
> Nick
>
> 2009/3/31 Roger Hyam <rogerhyam at mac.com>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using P4 and OWLDoc. When I generate an OWLDoc of an ontology with
>> equivalent classes in I get the classes mentioned in the equivalence
>> promoted to being direct children of Thing. They are not direct
>> children of Thing in the P4 interface.
>>
>> I attach a simple ontology that demonstrates this (if the mail server
>> will handle attachments)
>>
>> Is this a bug in me or OWLDoc?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>>
>> Please point me to the correct list to bring this up if I am in the
>> wrong place.
>>
>> Roger
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p4-feedback mailing list
>> p4-feedback at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/p4-feedback
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/p4-feedback/attachments/20090401/b6c8e652/attachment.html>


More information about the p4-feedback mailing list