Search Mailing List Archives
[p4-feedback] P4 and OWL 1
sdavid at delicias.dia.fi.upm.es
Tue Apr 7 07:54:03 PDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Nick Drummond wrote:
> There are lots of owl2 constructs that would break compatibility.
You're right, I know there are several new constructs in OWL2, but I
was referring only to the "syntactic sugar" constructs, like
AllDisjointClasses, not in general to all new constructors that add
expressiveness (like, e.g., qualified cardinality) and cannot be mapped
to OWL 1. Sorry for not specifying that.
> Let me know what you find. It might be that this is avoidable at
> serialisation time.
I'll try that and let you know.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the p4-feedback