Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[p4-feedback] P4 and OWL 1

Stefano David sdavid at delicias.dia.fi.upm.es
Tue Apr 7 07:54:03 PDT 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Nick,

Nick Drummond wrote:
> Stefano,
> 
> There are lots of owl2 constructs that would break compatibility.
You're right, I know there are several new constructs in OWL2, but  I
was referring only to the "syntactic sugar" constructs, like
AllDisjointClasses, not in general to all new constructors that add
expressiveness (like, e.g., qualified cardinality) and cannot be mapped
to OWL 1. Sorry for not specifying that.

> Let me know what you find. It might be that this is avoidable at
> serialisation time.
I'll try that and let you know.

Thanks again,
Stefano
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJ22kLAdgNxdAXG9QRApA8AJ9Xpdcbh65IWcLsj3GNvSnWdI1qBACeNcmH
nFdmhQBUKhJ0WMWp53tzrdM=
=I+CT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the p4-feedback mailing list