Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: OWL - Science

Daniel Goergen daniel.goergen at biotronik.com
Tue Nov 28 01:20:29 PST 2006


Luciana Costa <lcosta_am at yahoo.com.br> 
Gesendet von: protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu
27.11.2006 19:14
Bitte antworten an
User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor 
<protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>


An
User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor 
<protege-discussion at lists.Stanford.EDU>
Kopie

Thema
Re: [protege-discussion] Antwort: Re:  OWL - Science 






 > What do you mean ? Is not it interesting ?

If you really mean building an ontology that includes all scopes of 
science that would surely be interesting yet impossible (imho).
You can define an ontology about one scope of science or a very general 
one that covers some terms used in every scope of science.


----------------------------------------
Daniel Goergen
Graduand
Health Services

Tel.: +49 30 68905 - 2418

BIOTRONIK GmbH & Co. KG
Woermannkehre 1, 12359 Berlin




More information about the protege-discussion mailing list