Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] Missing source?
Jennifer Vendetti
vendetti at stanford.edu
Tue Oct 10 14:55:29 PDT 2006
A couple of small additions to Tania's response:
1). Our Ant build file is documented on our Web site:
http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/readme.html
2). If you don't feel like dealing with Ant or JavaCC, you could
download the source code from the download page on our Web site. Each
time we do a build, we put the source code for the build in ZIP file
format on our downloads page:
http://protege.stanford.edu/download/prerelease/protege-src-3.2.zip
Jennifer
Tania Tudorache wrote:
> Michael,
>
> We have removed the parser classes from the svn code tree. These classes
> are automatically generated by javacc, if you run the build.xml (If you
> want only the parser classes to be generated and not to compile all the
> classes, run the "javacc" target from build.xml, otherwise run the "jar"
> or "dist" targets).
>
> In order to run the "javacc" target from the build file, you will have
> to create a copy of the local.properties.template and rename it to
> local.properties in which you set the right javacc path from your computer.
>
> Tania
>
> Shepherd, Michael wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I checked out the latest Protégé source code from SVN and I'm getting a compile error that Parser is missing from ClipsKnowledgeBaseFactory. Didn't there used to be a Parser class in this package, or am I missing a library?
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
More information about the protege-discussion
mailing list