[protege-discussion] Number of Instances of one class can not be large??

[Congmin min]

Ok,  I will send you one later.Thanks,



On 9/6/06, Tania Tudorache <tudorache at stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> No, there is no limitation on the number of instances of a class.
>
> Can you email me privately the OWL file, so that I can debug this?
>
> Please ask in future OWL related questions on the OWL mailing list.
>
> Thanks,
> Tania
>
>
> Congmin min wrote:
>
> >I am doing some experiments and seems to find another BUG. To officially
> >report that, I want to ask:
> >
> >Is there any restrictions on the number of instances of one class? The
> >problem I have now is that once the number of instances of one class
> exceeds
> >a certain number, Protege failed to load the OWL File, although the file
> is
> >pretty small, just several MBs. It is not a memory issue.
> >
> >Thanks for any info.
> >_______________________________________________
> >protege-discussion mailing list
> >protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> >https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>