Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Tania Tudorache
tudorache at stanford.edu
Thu Sep 7 17:15:54 PDT 2006
Congmin,
I did receive your email. Indeed this is a problem, that you have to
first load the OWL file in memory and then to export it to an OWL
database. We are looking at ways on how to do a streaming writing to the
database directly.
Until then, you need to increase the heap size, if you need to
accomodate very large ontologies.
Tania
Congmin min wrote:
> Hi, Tania:
>
> I am attaching three files for your testing:
> The .tar.gz contains three owl files I generated. Both are very
> simple owl files, only containing one class and a number of instances
> of this class. This is just for testing purpose. And three files are
> quite small: about 8 MB, 5 MB and 3 MB.
>
> test.200000.owl: one 'Concept' class and 120000 instances of it
> test.120000.owl: one 'Concept' class and 120000 instances of it
> test.50000.owl: one 'Concept' class and 50000 instances of it
>
> On my computer I can load test.50000.owl within 2 minutes,
> test.120000 within 5 minutes, but can't load test.200000.owl (I waited
> for 30 minutes). My computer has about 1GB memory.
>
> If your computer is more powerful than mine, you can use the little
> test.cc to generate an ontology with more than 200000 instances of a
> class, (you only need to pass a 'number' you want at the command line
> when executing 'a.out' ) and then test agin.
>
> If I am not doing something wrong, it looks like Protege doen't
> allow a class to have a certain number of instances; otherwise, it
> would have difficluty in loading the file. This is true to database
> option.
>
> If you received this email, please kindly let me know.
> Thank you
>
>
>
>
> On 9/7/06, *Mail Delivery System* < MAILER-DAEMON at lists.stanford.edu
> <mailto:MAILER-DAEMON at lists.stanford.edu>> wrote:
>
> This is the Postfix program at host mailman.stanford.edu
> <http://mailman.stanford.edu>.
>
> I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
>
> For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
>
> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> delete your own text from the attached returned message.
>
> The Postfix program
>
> <protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu
> <mailto:protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu>>: mail forwarding
> loop for
> protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu
> <mailto:protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu>
>
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822; protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu
> <mailto:protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu>
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.0.0
> Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; mail forwarding loop for
> protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu
> <mailto:protege-discussion at mailman.stanford.edu>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Congmin min" < marlonmin at gmail.com
> <mailto:marlonmin at gmail.com>>
> To: protege-discussion at lists.Stanford.EDU
> <mailto:protege-discussion at lists.Stanford.EDU>
> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:54:26 -0500
> Subject: [protege-discussion] Number of Instances of one class can
> not be large??
> I am doing some experiments and seems to find another BUG. To
> officially
> report that, I want to ask:
>
> Is there any restrictions on the number of instances of one class? The
> problem I have now is that once the number of instances of one
> class exceeds
> a certain number, Protege failed to load the OWL File, although
> the file is
> pretty small, just several MBs. It is not a memory issue.
>
> Thanks for any info.
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> <mailto:protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu>
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
> <https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion>
>
>
>
More information about the protege-discussion
mailing list