Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Protege versions - when use them.

Marisa Santos Amaro marisa.osantos at gmail.com
Fri Sep 8 07:21:05 PDT 2006


Thank for your explanations, Samson.

On 9/4/06, Samson Tu <swt at stanford.edu> wrote:
> Prior to Protege 2.0, the name for Protege was "Protege-2000." The
> documentation that still refers to "Protege-2000" probably is relevant
> only for what we call "Protege-frame" now. If you are using OWL, you
> definitely want to use Protege 3.2 and stick to Protege-OWL documentation.
>
> There is a Protege Web Browser
> (http://protege.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ProtegeWebBrowser), but I don't
> know its current status with respect to OWL ontologies.
>
> Samson
>
> Marisa Santos Amaro wrote:
> > Hi all.
> > I´ m building an OWL ontology  using Protege 3.2 and sometimes I confused
> > with references in the documentation about other versions, like Protege
> > 2000. What the diferences between Protege 2000 and 3.2 version ?
> >  Is there any web version of Protege for editing and querying OWL
> > ontologies?
> >
> > Thanks, people !!
> >
> >
> > Marisa.
> > _______________________________________________
> > protege-discussion mailing list
> > protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>



More information about the protege-discussion mailing list