Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] error in defining an enumerated class

Joe Huang joe.huang at sdrcinc.net
Thu Apr 26 16:50:54 PDT 2007


Ah ha, I saw that one too, I clicked on it before and saw nothing
happened. This time I pressed "Enter" and it actually added itself into
the instance list. That's neat, thank you!

-----Original Message-----
From: protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu
[mailto:protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of
Thomas Russ
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 4:40 PM
To: User support for Core Protege and the Protege-Frames editor
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] error in defining an enumerated class


On Apr 26, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Joe Huang wrote:

> re-self:
>
> I found out why: I'd need to create instances for the IDs of every  
> item inside the enumeration class first (i.e. under owl:Thing).  
> Then it works.

For me, the editor also adds a little arrow at the left side of the  
editing field, which shows a drop-down menu offering to create the  
missing objects.  It will create all the instances under Thing, but I  
usually like to move them afterwards under the enumeration concept.   
(Yeah, I know that the reasoner will classify them there, but it  
makes things neater when running the editor without classifying....)


_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion

Instructions for unsubscribing:
http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 



More information about the protege-discussion mailing list