Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Missing map instance warnings fromGraphWidget

Jonathan Carter jonathan.carter at e-asolutions.com
Fri Dec 21 03:06:53 PST 2007


Thanks Samson. Good suggestions in there.

Jonathan
_________________________________________



-----Original Message-----
From: protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu
[mailto:protege-discussion-bounces at lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Samson
Tu
Sent: 20 December 2007 20:06
To: protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [protege-discussion] Missing map instance warnings
fromGraphWidget

Jonathan Carter wrote:
> Hi Samson,
> 
> OK, so to make sure I understand, if I create a graph in a client, 
> when I come to open it again, the server cannot serve me the
locations/sizes etc.
> and so everything reverts to default (at least it doesn't fail or crash!)?

Yes. The automatic layout feature is probably your best option with new
graphs in client/server mode.

> 
> What I've got is a project that was created in stand-alone mode, 
> including some graphs and now I'm using this project in client-server 
> mode and even all the graph properties that I can see in the server 
> project files are not 'sent down' to the clients. So, effectively, 
> I've started with what you suggested as the solution but am still 
> having problems. If I open the server's project locally on the server 
> in stand-alone mode, everything is fine with my graphs. I saved this 
> standalone project to a new version on the server and used this for 
> client-server mode, but I am still getting the warnings from my clients.

Install the most recent version of Protege 3.4 beta. I never used Protege in
client/server mode until this past week because of problems with form
customizations and graph widget, but Protege developers have fixed some of
these bugs recently. You should get the standalone layout with the current
beta at least.


> Do you know if there are any plans to resolve this at some point? Or 
> are there any pointers/thoughts as to what the solution is? I'd be 
> happy to help resolve the issue.

There is hope that the issue may get resolved early next year.

Samson
-- 
Samson Tu                                   email: swt at stanford.edu
Senior Research Scientist                   web: www.stanford.edu/~swt/
Center for Biomedical Informatics Research  phone: 1-650-725-3391
Stanford University                         fax: 1-650-725-7944

_______________________________________________
protege-discussion mailing list
protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion

Instructions for unsubscribing:
http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 





More information about the protege-discussion mailing list