Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] Inverse Slot with system slots
tudorache at stanford.edu
Wed Jan 10 12:47:37 PST 2007
There is another solution that I have used sometimes ago. I have created
subslots of :FORM and :TO for example :FROM-STATE and :TO-STATE.
For the subslots you can specify the inverse slot. And the values of the
subslots are values of the slot (so of :FROM). In this way, the
GraphWidget works also fine and you can use the inverse slots as well.
Samson Tu wrote:
> Unfortunately, :FROM and :TO are system slots that are not modifiable by
> users. I don't know of any way to define inverse slots on them. It would
> be nice if graph widget provides the configuration option to specify
> user-defined subslots of :FROM and :TO to use in specific graphs.
> For my application, I post-process the graphs to insert outgoing
> references to nodes in my graph.
> Daniel Goergen wrote:
>> I am using the Graph Widget to specify State Machines. The States connect
>> via a Transitions that are Instances of a Subclass of
>> To store the States the transition connects the system-slots :TO and :FROM
>> are used.
>> My Problem is that the States themselves need to know their outgoing
>> transitions which would be possible by defining an inverse slot to :FROM.
>> Because system slots are not visible when defining inverse slots I am not
>> able to do that.
>> Is there maybe a way to define inverse slots for system slots?
>> Daniel Goergen
>> Health Services
>> Tel.: +49 30 68905 - 2418
>> BIOTRONIK GmbH & Co. KG
>> Woermannkehre 1, 12359 Berlin
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
More information about the protege-discussion