[protege-discussion] Inverse Slot with system slots

[Tania Tudorache]

There is another solution that I have used sometimes ago. I have created 
subslots of :FORM and :TO for example :FROM-STATE and :TO-STATE.

For the subslots you can specify the inverse slot. And the values of the 
subslots are values of the slot (so of :FROM). In this way, the 
GraphWidget works also fine and you can use the inverse slots as well.

Tania


Samson Tu wrote:
> Unfortunately, :FROM and :TO are system slots that are not modifiable by 
> users. I don't know of any way to define inverse slots on them. It would 
> be nice if graph widget provides the configuration option to specify 
> user-defined subslots of :FROM and :TO to use in specific graphs.
>
> For my application, I post-process the graphs to insert outgoing 
> references to nodes in my graph.
>
> Samson
>
> Daniel Goergen wrote:
>   
>> Hello!
>>
>>
>> I am using the Graph Widget to specify State Machines. The States connect 
>> via a Transitions that are Instances of a Subclass of 
>> Directed-Binary-Relation.
>> To store the States the transition connects the system-slots :TO and :FROM 
>> are used.
>> My Problem is that the States themselves need to know their outgoing 
>> transitions which would be possible by defining an inverse slot to :FROM.
>>  Because system slots are not visible when defining inverse slots I am not 
>> able to do that. 
>>
>> Is there maybe a way to define inverse slots for system slots?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> Daniel Goergen
>> Graduand
>> Health Services
>>
>> Tel.: +49 30 68905 - 2418
>>
>> BIOTRONIK GmbH & Co. KG
>> Woermannkehre 1, 12359 Berlin
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
>>
>>     
>
>
>