[protege-discussion] Antwort: [SPAM] Re: Antwort: ChangeHistory+ TIMESTAMPS

[Daniel Holbert]

That's great!  How soon do you expect that the updated ChangesTab will 
be ready?

~Daniel

Timothy Redmond wrote:
> 
> 
> Funny you should mention this.  We are working on this right now.
> Getting this to work involves refactoring to separate the code that
> records changes in the main ontology from the code that displays the
> changes in the tab.  We anticipate that it will work but there will
> be a limitation that you can only have one project that uses the
> changes tab on the server.
> 
> -Timothy
> 
> 
> On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> 
>  > Hi Tania (and any ChangesTab developers),
>  >
>  > The ChangesTab doesn't seem to support Multi-User Mode right now.  Any
>  > idea if/when that will be available?  I'd be very interested in making
>  > use of that plugin for a multi-user project I'm working on in PharmGKB
>  > right now.
>  >
>  > Thanks!
>  >
>  > Daniel Holbert
>  > PharmGKB
>  > Stanford University
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Tania Tudorache wrote:
>  >> Sascha, Daniel,
>  >>
>  >> Protege does have change history capabilities. This is done by the
>  >> ChangesTab plugin, which is distributed with the full installation of
>  >> Protege.
>  >>
>  >> You can find the documentation about the ChangesTab here:
>  >> http://protege.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ChangeManagement
>  >>
>  >> If you enable from the Project-> Configure menu the ChangesTab, all
>  >> changes you will do in your ontology will be recorded as instances
>  >> of a
>  >> Change ontology. You can also annotate each change. The changes
>  >> will be
>  >> saved as a separate ontology which can be used when comparing two
>  >> versions of the same ontology.
>  >>
>  >> The ChangesTab is under active development.
>  >>
>  >> Tania
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Daniel Goergen wrote:
>  >>> Hi Sascha,
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>>> thanks for the answer, however the proposed solution is not the
>  >>>> nicest one, isn't it ...
>  >>>>
>  >>>
>  >>> well, atm it´s the only possible solution, isn´t it?
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>>> With approaches of subversion, ClearCase or similar, I can only
>  >>>> make
>  >>>> labels on the whole ProtegeProject instead of tracking histories of
>  >>>> each element on its own.
>  >>>>
>  >>>
>  >>> the protege pprj, pins and ponts are not binary so eg. with svn you
>  >> could
>  >>> track every single change.
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>>> Each part of Protege (Slots, Contstrains, Classes, Instances) sould
>  >>>> be able to have a history with Changelog.
>  >>>>
>  >>>
>  >>> feel free to implement this feature, I would appreciate that ;O)
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>> bye
>  >>>
>  >>> daniel
>  >>> _______________________________________________
>  >>> protege-discussion mailing list
>  >>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>  >>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>  >>>
>  >>> Instructions for unsubscribing:
>  >> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>
>  >> _______________________________________________
>  >> protege-discussion mailing list
>  >> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>  >> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>  >>
>  >> Instructions for unsubscribing:
>  >> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>  >>
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > protege-discussion mailing list
>  > protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>  > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>  >
>  > Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/
>  > faq.html#01a.03
> 
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
> 
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/
> faq.html#01a.03
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
> 
> Instructions for unsubscribing: 
> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>