[protege-discussion] Antwort: [SPAM] Re: Antwort: ChangeHistory+ TIMESTAMPS

[Timothy Redmond]

On Jan 26, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:

> That's great!  How soon do you expect that the updated ChangesTab will
> be ready?

This is hard to say at the moment.  There significant motivation to  
get this ready very soon (Feb 11) and we are working towards this  
deadline.  But this might be a reasonably complicated refactor and so  
I can't guarantee this.  But it probably will fix this within the  
next three months or so in any case.

-Timothy


>
> ~Daniel
>
> Timothy Redmond wrote:
>>
>>
>> Funny you should mention this.  We are working on this right now.
>> Getting this to work involves refactoring to separate the code that
>> records changes in the main ontology from the code that displays the
>> changes in the tab.  We anticipate that it will work but there will
>> be a limitation that you can only have one project that uses the
>> changes tab on the server.
>>
>> -Timothy
>>
>>
>> On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tania (and any ChangesTab developers),
>>>
>>> The ChangesTab doesn't seem to support Multi-User Mode right  
>>> now.  Any
>>> idea if/when that will be available?  I'd be very interested in  
>>> making
>>> use of that plugin for a multi-user project I'm working on in  
>>> PharmGKB
>>> right now.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Daniel Holbert
>>> PharmGKB
>>> Stanford University
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tania Tudorache wrote:
>>>> Sascha, Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> Protege does have change history capabilities. This is done by the
>>>> ChangesTab plugin, which is distributed with the full  
>>>> installation of
>>>> Protege.
>>>>
>>>> You can find the documentation about the ChangesTab here:
>>>> http://protege.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ChangeManagement
>>>>
>>>> If you enable from the Project-> Configure menu the ChangesTab, all
>>>> changes you will do in your ontology will be recorded as instances
>>>> of a
>>>> Change ontology. You can also annotate each change. The changes
>>>> will be
>>>> saved as a separate ontology which can be used when comparing two
>>>> versions of the same ontology.
>>>>
>>>> The ChangesTab is under active development.
>>>>
>>>> Tania
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Daniel Goergen wrote:
>>>>> Hi Sascha,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for the answer, however the proposed solution is not the
>>>>>> nicest one, isn't it ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> well, atm it´s the only possible solution, isn´t it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> With approaches of subversion, ClearCase or similar, I can only
>>>>>> make
>>>>>> labels on the whole ProtegeProject instead of tracking  
>>>>>> histories of
>>>>>> each element on its own.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> the protege pprj, pins and ponts are not binary so eg. with svn  
>>>>> you
>>>> could
>>>>> track every single change.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Each part of Protege (Slots, Contstrains, Classes, Instances)  
>>>>>> sould
>>>>>> be able to have a history with Changelog.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> feel free to implement this feature, I would appreciate that ;O)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> bye
>>>>>
>>>>> daniel
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> protege-discussion mailing list
>>>>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>>>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>> Instructions for unsubscribing:
>>>> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> protege-discussion mailing list
>>>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>>>
>>>> Instructions for unsubscribing:
>>>> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> protege-discussion mailing list
>>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>>
>>> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/
>>> faq.html#01a.03
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/
>> faq.html#01a.03
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>>
>> Instructions for unsubscribing:
>> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/ 
> faq.html#01a.03