Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-discussion] Any known side effects when changing frame identifier in protege frames?
tudorache at stanford.edu
Fri Mar 9 11:01:05 PST 2007
You won't have any problems in Protege 3 if you change the name of a
slot. The frames are identified in memory and in database projects by a
FrameID and not by name. The name is just another slot on the frame.
The FrameID are not persistent in files mode, they are regenerated each
time you load an ontology. In database mode, the FrameID are persistent
and stored in the "frame" column of the database table, as Markus also
mentioned. So changing the name of a frame is safe.
Markus Bohr wrote:
> Jens Selbach <Jens.Selbach <at> loyaltypartner.com> writes:
>> Does a change of internal
>> instance id result in updates of all relations, or is it just in one
>> Is it a save thing to change instance id or is this already something
>> not 100% supported?
>> protege-discussion mailing list
>> protege-discussion <at> lists.stanford.edu
>> Instructions for unsubscribing:
> Hello Jens,
> >From everything I learnt from the database backend, this shouldn't cause any
> problems, as each frame instance will get a unique numeric ID in column "frame"
> of table "ProtegeData" and this ID is not dependent on the entered :NAME value.
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
More information about the protege-discussion