Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-discussion] Necessary and Sufficient conditions in Protege-Frames/Protege-OWL

Nick Drummond nick.drummond at cs.manchester.ac.uk
Wed Apr 30 03:10:19 PDT 2008


I've moved this discussion to the protege-owl mailing list.

On 28 Apr 2008, at 20:46, Kiran Dasari wrote:

> Samson,
>
> Thank you very much. Can we implement the SWRL rules in Protege 4.0 ?
>
> Kiran
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Samson Tu <swt at stanford.edu> wrote:
> You can define such restrictions in OWL 1.1 (now renamed OWL 2.0,
> supported by Protege 4.0). In Protege frame or Protege OWL 3.x, you  
> have
> to use rules to define them.
>
> Samson
>
>
> Kiran Dasari wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I am sorry. I have been repeatedly asking the same question from  
> many
> > days. I thought I will be more clear with an example.
> >
> > I have a restriction like :-
> >
> > If temperature > 50C || temperature <10C, then situation is  
> "abnormal"
> > If temperature <40C && temperature >10C, then situation is "normal
> > condition"
> >
> > Simillarly I have one more restriction like
> >
> > If temperature > 40C && Pressure > 100 psi, then situation is  
> "abnormal"
> >
> > I was wondering if I can create such restrictions in Protege- 
> Frames or
> > will it be possible to create them in protege-owl,and if so how do  
> I do
> > it. To my knowledge I know that we can't create such rules in
> > protege-frames. Please correct me if I am wrong.
> >
> > I have the temperature and pressure values in a text file associated
> > with their respective sensor ID's.
> > for example:-
> >
> > 001|50|    -- 001 is the sensorID ; 50 is the measurement
> > 002|30|
> >
> > The sensor class in the ontology has subclasses like temperature  
> sensor
> > and pressure sensor. The subclasses have properties like  
> "hasSensorID" &
> > "hasMeasurement" using which I create individuals like tempsensor1,
> > tempsenor2 etc.
> >
> > For example--
> >
> > tempsensor1 -- hasSensorID 001 and hasMeasurement ..... ; In the
> > "hasMeasurement" property i am confused whether I need to give a
> > range or else leave it blank so that I can send the measurement  
> from the
> > text file.
> >
> > There is also a situation class in the ontology with the  
> "abnormal" ,
> > "normal conditions" as individuals.
> >
> > Now my question is, how do I check the  measurementvalues in the  
> text
> > file using the "hasSensorID" values that I assigned to the sensors  
> in
> > the ontology.
> >
> > I will really appreciate it if someone can help me with a  
> suggestion.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kiran
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > protege-discussion mailing list
> > protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
> >
> > Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-discussion mailing list
> protege-discussion at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-discussion
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-discussion/attachments/20080430/4d867404/attachment.html>


More information about the protege-discussion mailing list